The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rectal Cancer: The Basingstoke Experience of Total Mesorectal Excision, 1978-1997
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of total mesorectal excision in the management of rectal cancer. DESIGN: A prospective consecutive case series. SETTING: A district hospital and referral center in Basingstoke, England. PATIENTS: Five hundred nineteen surgical patients with adenocarcinoma of the rectum treated for cure or palliation. INTERVENTIONS: Anterior resections (n = 465) with low stapled anastomoses (407 total mesorectal excisions), abdominoperineal resections (n = 37), Hartmann resections (n = 10), local excisions (n = 4), and laparotomy only (n = 3). Preoperative radiotherapy was used in 49 patients (7 with abdominoperineal resections, 38 with anterior resections, 3 with Hartmann resections, and 1 with laparotomy). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Local recurrence and cancer-specific survival. RESULTS: Cancer-specific survival of all surgically treated patients was 68% at 5 years and 66% at 10 years. The local recurrence rate was 6% (95% confidence interval, 2%-10%) at 5 years and 8% (95% confidence interval, 2%-14%) at 10 years. In 405 "curative" resections, the local recurrence rate was 3% (95% confidence interval, 0%-5%) at 5 years and 4% (95% confidence interval, 0%-8%) at 10 years. Disease-free survival in this group was 80% at 5 years and 78% at 10 years. An analysis of histopathological risk factors for recurrence indicates only the Dukes stage, extramural vascular invasion, and tumor differentiation as variables in these results. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal cancer can be cured by surgical therapy alone in 2 of 3 patients undergoing surgical excision in all stages and in 4 of 5 patients having curative resections. In future clinical trials of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, strategies should incorporate total mesorectal excision as the surgical procedure of choice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gérard, J.-P., Conroy, T., Bonnetain, F., Bouché, O., Chapet, O., Closon-Dejardin, M.-T., Untereiner, M., Leduc, B., Francois, É., Maurel, J., et al. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2006.06.7629 · Cited by 1,731
Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm
Martling, A. L., Holm, T., Rutqvist, L.-E., Moran, B., Heald, R., & Cedermark, B. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02469-7 · Cited by 772
Self-citationGérard, J.-P., Azria, D., Gourgou-Bourgade, S., Martel-Laffay, I., Hennequin, C., Etienne, P.-L., Vendrely, V., François, E., de La Roche, G., Bouché, O., et al. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.25.8376 · Cited by 747
Indication and Benefit of Pelvic Sidewall Dissection for Rectal Cancer
Sugihara, K., Kobayashi, H., Kato, T., Mori, T., Mochizuki, H., Kameoka, S., Shirouzu, K., & Muto, T. (2006) · Diseases of the Colon & Rectum · doi:10.1007/s10350-006-0714-z · Cited by 427
Guillem, J. G., Chessin, D. B., Cohen, A. M., Shia, J., Mazumdar, M., Enker, W., Paty, P. B., Weiser, M. R., Klimstra, D., Saltz, L., et al. (2005) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000161980.46459.96 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Heald, R. J., Moran, B. J., Ryall, R. D. H., Sexton, R., & MacFarlane, J. K.
- Venue
- Archives of Surgery
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1998-08-01
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 894-9
- ISSN
- 0004-0010 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2127699440
- Cited by
- 1,399
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rectal Cancer: The Basingstoke Experience of Total Mesorectal Excision, 1978-1997. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archsurg.133.8.894
- The paper
- Heald, R. J., Moran, B. J., Ryall, R. D. H., Sexton, R., & MacFarlane, J. K. (1998). Rectal Cancer: The Basingstoke Experience of Total Mesorectal Excision, 1978-1997. Archives of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.133.8.894
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.