Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 329

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Contemporary Trends in Student Selection of Medical Specialties: The Potential Impact on General Surgery

Bland, Kirby I., Isaacs, George·2002·Archives of Surgery

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Lifestyle is a priority among senior medical students when selecting a career specialty. The trend toward controllable lifestyle vs noncontrollable lifestyle specialties is affecting the number of students desiring a career in general surgery. DESIGN: The Medical Student Graduation Questionnaire is published and distributed by the Association of American Medical Colleges to all US medical schools for senior medical students to complete before graduation. The results from the survey are published each year in the All Schools Report. We evaluated these reports to track the percentage of students pursuing a career in general surgery during the past decade. The National Resident Matching Program also publishes a report each year outlining the match results. We reviewed these results from 1978 through 2001 and used them to determine the percentage of students choosing to enter general surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: First choice of specialty among graduating senior students from US medical schools; positions matched by US and foreign medical students and students from osteopathic medical schools; factors that influenced the decision-making process in choice of specialty; and factors that influenced students to change their mind from one career to another. RESULTS: An established trend of decreasing interest in general surgery exists and has the potential to affect the number of positions that are filled each year in the match. Linear projections confirm that, should the current trend continue (negative slope; P =.01), by 2005 only 4.8% of US graduating senior medical students will be interested in general surgery. This established trend of decreasing interest in general surgery, which began in the early 1980s, did not affect the match until 2001, when the number of positions offered exceeded the number of students interested in general surgery. At present, the specialty of general surgery is at risk for significant numbers of positions remaining unfilled. Our match projections estimate that for 2005, only 76.6% of positions will be filled by US senior students (negative slope; P =.001). CONCLUSIONS: If the trend continues, the students matching in general surgery will not be as competitive as in years past, and there will be a potential shortage of these specialists in the United States.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archsurg.137.3.259

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 329

Metadata

Authors
Bland, K. I., & Isaacs, G.
Venue
Archives of Surgery
Published
2002-03-01
Volume
137
Issue
3
Pages
259-67
ISSN
0004-0010 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148812361
Cited by
329
References
0
FWCI
82.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contemporary Trends in Student Selection of Medical Specialties: The Potential Impact on General Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archsurg.137.3.259
The paper
Bland, K. I., & Isaacs, G. (2002). Contemporary Trends in Student Selection of Medical Specialties: The Potential Impact on General Surgery. Archives of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.137.3.259

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.