The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Utility of Tumor Markers in Determining Resectability of Pancreatic Cancer
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS: Despite advances in preoperative radiologic imaging, a significant fraction of potentially resectable pancreatic cancers are found to be unresectable at laparotomy. We tested the hypothesis that preoperative serum levels of CA19-9 (cancer antigen) and carcinoembryonic antigen will identify patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer despite radiologic staging demonstrating resectable disease. DESIGN AND SETTING: Academic tertiary care referral center. PATIENTS: From March 1, 1996, to July 31, 2002, 125 patients were identified who underwent surgical exploration for potentially resectable pancreatic cancer based on a preoperative computed tomographic scan; in 89 of them a preoperative tumor marker had been measured. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preoperative tumor markers (CA19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen) were correlated with extent of disease at exploration. As CA19-9 is excreted in the biliary system, CA19-9 adjusted for the degree of hyperbilirubinemia was determined and analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 89 patients, 40 (45%) had localized disease and underwent resection, 25 (28%) had locally advanced (unresectable) disease, and 24 (27%) had metastatic disease. The mean adjusted CA19-9 level was significantly lower in those with localized disease than those with locally advanced (63 vs 592; P =.003) or metastatic (63 vs 1387; P<.001) disease. When a threshold adjusted CA19-9 level of 150 was used, the positive predictive value for determination of unresectable disease was 88%. Carcinoembryonic antigen level was not correlated with extent of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Among the patients with resectable pancreatic cancer based on preoperative imaging studies, those with abnormally high serum levels of CA19-9 may have unresectable disease. These patients may benefit from additional staging modalities such as diagnostic laparoscopy to avoid unnecessary laparotomy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ferrone, C. R., Finkelstein, D. M., Thayer, S. P., Muzikansky, A., Castillo, C. F.-D., & Warshaw, A. L. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.05.3934 · Cited by 554
CA 19-9: Biochemical and Clinical Aspects
Scarà, S., Bottoni, P., & Scatena, R. (2015) · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-7215-0_15 · Cited by 351
Hartwig, W., Strobel, O., Hinz, U., Fritz, S., Hackert, T., Roth, C., Büchler, M. W., & Werner, J. (2013) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2809-1 · Cited by 301
Metadata
- Authors
- Schlieman, M. G.
- Venue
- Archives of Surgery
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2003-09-01
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 951
- ISSN
- 0004-0010 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2065732412
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Utility of Tumor Markers in Determining Resectability of Pancreatic Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archsurg.138.9.951
- The paper
- Schlieman, M. G. (2003). Utility of Tumor Markers in Determining Resectability of Pancreatic Cancer. Archives of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.138.9.951
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.