Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 240

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Significance of Popliteal Reflux in Relation to Ambulatory Venous Pressure and Ulceration

Shull, Kenneth C.·1979·Archives of Surgery

Abstract

Fifty-one patients (55 limbs) who had had deep venous thrombosis (DVT) extending into the femoral or iliofemoral segment three to five years earlier and ten limbs of ten healthy volunteers were studied. The ambulatory venous pressure (AVP) was measured by inserting a needle in a vein on the foot; the presence of reflux in the popliteal vein was determined by a directional Doppler ultrasonic blood velocity detector. All patients had ascending venography. The results suggest that the most important factor in determining the AVP and ulceration in postthrombotic limbs is the condition of the popliteal valves. Ulceration does not occur even in the presence of occlusion if the popliteal valves are competent. The extent of DVT and recanalization or the failure of recanalization is of secondary importance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archsurg.1979.01370350106012

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 240

Metadata

Authors
Shull, K. C.
Venue
Archives of Surgery
Published
1979-11-01
Volume
114
Issue
11
Pages
1304
ISSN
0004-0010 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042529489
Cited by
240
References
0
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Significance of Popliteal Reflux in Relation to Ambulatory Venous Pressure and Ulceration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archsurg.1979.01370350106012
The paper
Shull, K. C. (1979). Significance of Popliteal Reflux in Relation to Ambulatory Venous Pressure and Ulceration. Archives of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1979.01370350106012

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.