The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Randomized Trial of Preoperative Chemotherapy for Squamous Cell Cancer of the Esophagus
Abstract
Of 77 patients with potentially resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus who were asked to participate in a phase III trial of treatment with either immediate surgery (n = 24) or surgery plus preoperative chemotherapy (n = 22), only 46 agreed to randomization. A priori, 13 patients chose chemotherapy before surgery and 18 patients chose surgery only. The complete chemotherapy program consisted of three cycles with fluorouracil, 1 g/m2 per day for 5 days, and cisplatin, 20 mg/m2 per day for 5 days. The response rate to chemotherapy was 50% (17 of 34 patients). Side effects of therapy were higher than expected based on results of previous phase II studies. Two drug-related deaths were observed. The resectability rate for patients in the surgery only group was 79% (33 of 42 patients) compared with 70% (19 of 27 patients) for patients receiving chemotherapy. The postoperative rates of septic complications (41% [11 of 27 patients] vs 26% [11 of 42 patients]) and respiratory disorders (48% [13 of 27 patients] vs 31% [13 of 42 patients]) were higher for patients with preoperative chemotherapy than for those treated with surgery only. Surgery-related mortality was increased in the chemotherapy group (19% [five of 27 patients]) compared with the surgery only group (10% [four of 42 patients]). Patients responding to preoperative chemotherapy had prolonged survival (median, 13 months) compared with nonresponders (median, 5 months), but the median survival for the chemotherapy group and the surgery only group was identical (10 months). We conclude that the preoperative chemotherapy regime used in this multi-institutional trial neither influences resectability nor increases the overall survival of patients with localized esophageal cancer. However, preoperative chemotherapy is associated with considerable side effects and a high postoperative mortality rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sjoquist, K. M., Burmeister, B. H., Smithers, B. M., Zalcberg, J. R., Simes, R. J., Barbour, A., & Gebski, V. (2011) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70142-5 · Cited by 1,647
Bosset, J.-F., Gignoux, M., Triboulet, J.-P., Tiret, E., Mantion, G., Elias, D., Lozach, P., Ollier, J.-C., Pavy, J.-J., Mercier, M., et al. (1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199707173370304 · Cited by 1,376
Gebski, V., Burmeister, B., Smithers, B. M., Foo, K., Zalcberg, J., & Simes, J. (2007) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(07)70039-6 · Cited by 1,158
Ancona, E., Ruol, A., Santi, S., Merigliano, S., Sileni, V. C., Koussis, H., Zaninotto, G., Bonavina, L., & Peracchia, A. (2001) · PubMed · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(20010601)91:11<2165::aid-cncr1245>3.0.co;2-h · Cited by 401
Law, S., Fok, M., Chow*, S., Chu, K.-M., & Wong, J. (1997) · The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0022-5223(97)70147-8 · Cited by 381
Metadata
- Authors
- Schlag, P. M.
- Venue
- Archives of Surgery
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1992-12-01
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1446
- ISSN
- 0004-0010 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2120014319
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized Trial of Preoperative Chemotherapy for Squamous Cell Cancer of the Esophagus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420120080015
- The paper
- Schlag, P. M. (1992). Randomized Trial of Preoperative Chemotherapy for Squamous Cell Cancer of the Esophagus. Archives of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420120080015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.