The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Perioperative Plasma Volume Expansion Reduces the Incidence of Gut Mucosal Hypoperfusion During Cardiac Surgery
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that perioperative plasma volume expansion would preserve gut mucosal perfusion during elective cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Prospective randomized open study. SETTING: Teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Sixty American Society of Anesthesiology grade III patients with a preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction of 50% or greater undergoing elective cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were allocated randomly to a control or protocol group. The control group was treated according to standard practices. After induction of general anesthesia, the protocol group received, in addition, 200-mL boluses of a 6% hydroxyethyl starch solution to obtain a maximum stroke volume. This procedure was repeated every 15 minutes until the end of surgery, except when the patient underwent cardiopulmonary bypass. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Cardiac stroke volume was estimated by an esophageal Doppler system, and gastric mucosal perfusion was measured by tonometric assessment of gastric intramucosal pH in all patients. Patients were followed up postoperatively until discharge from the hospital or death. The incidence of gut mucosal hypoperfusion (gastric intramucosal pH < 7.32) at the end of surgery was reduced in the protocol group (7% vs 56%) (P < .001), as were the number of patients in whom major complications developed (0 vs 6) (P = .01), mean number of days spent in the hospital (6.4 [range, 5 to 9] vs 10.1 [range, 5 to 48]) (P = .011), and mean number of days spent in the intensive care unit (1 [range, 1 to 1] vs 1.7 [range 1 to 11] days) (P = .023). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative plasma volume expansion with colloid during cardiac surgery, guided by esophageal Doppler measurement of cardiac stroke volume, reduced the incidence of gut mucosal hypoperfusion. This group of patients also had an improved outcome when compared with controls.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cecconi, M., Corredor, C., Arulkumaran, N., Abuella, G., Ball, J., Grounds, R. M., Hamilton, M., & Rhodes, A. (2012) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc11823 · Cited by 339
Bennett-Guerrero, E., Welsby, I., Dunn, T. J., Young, L. R., Wahl, T. A., Diers, T. L., Phillips-Bute, B. G., Newman, M. F., & Mythen, M. G. (1999) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1097/00000539-199908000-00050 · Cited by 309
Self-citationAbbas, S. M., & Hill, A. G. (2008) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05233.x · Cited by 296
Monitoring in the Intensive Care
Kipnis, E., Ramsingh, D., Bhargava, M., Dincer, E., Cannesson, M., Broccard, A., Vallet, B., Bendjelid, K., & Thibault, R. (2012) · Critical Care Research and Practice · doi:10.1155/2012/473507 · Cited by 87
Jacob, M., Chappell, D., Hofmann-Kiefer, K., Conzen, P., Peter, K., & Rehm, M. (2007) · Der Anaesthesist · doi:10.1007/s00101-007-1235-4 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Mythen, M. G.
- Venue
- Archives of Surgery
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1995-04-01
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 423
- ISSN
- 0004-0010 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2170665477
- Cited by
- 645
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perioperative Plasma Volume Expansion Reduces the Incidence of Gut Mucosal Hypoperfusion During Cardiac Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430040085019
- The paper
- Mythen, M. G. (1995). Perioperative Plasma Volume Expansion Reduces the Incidence of Gut Mucosal Hypoperfusion During Cardiac Surgery. Archives of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1995.01430040085019
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.