The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Skill Acquisition and Assessment for Laparoscopic Surgery
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe a training method with objective evaluation to enhance laparoscopic surgical skills to provide training in laparoscopic suturing techniques and to assess whether specific training exercises were helpful in the attainment of intracorporeal suturing skills. DESIGN: Trainees (N = 150) were asked to perform standardized drills with distinct mechanical features, and skill acquisition was determined by accuracy and timing. Trainees were tested for the ability to perform an intracorporeal laparoscopic suture before and after analogous skill training with the drills. SETTING: The training courses were held in teaching and nonteaching hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Board-certified or board-eligible surgeons. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Supervision by trained instructors and documentation of the time required to perform standardized drills. RESULTS: The trainees showed steady improvement in skill acquisition during 10 trials (P < .001). Significant (P < .001) improvement was noted for the performance of suturing after compared with before the drills. CONCLUSION: Three standardized laparoscopic drills have been tested in 150 trainees and demonstrate the incremental acquisition of skills that correlate with improved performance in a challenging and complex laparoscopic skill, intracorporeal suturing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ericsson, K. A. (2004) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200410001-00022 · Cited by 2,988
Simulation Technology for Health Care Professional Skills Training and Assessment
Issenberg, S. B. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.9.861 · Cited by 914
The Impact of Video Games on Training Surgeons in the 21st Century
Rosser, J. C. (2007) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.142.2.181 · Cited by 687
Self-citationA bio-inspired swellable microneedle adhesive for mechanical interlocking with tissue
Yang, S. Y., O'Cearbhaill, E. D., Sisk, G. C., Park, K. M., Cho, W. K., Villiger, M., Bouma, B. E., Pomahac, B., & Karp, J. M. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2715 · Cited by 448
Bland, K. I. (2006) · Yearbook of Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0090-3671(08)70537-8 · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosser, J. C.
- Venue
- Archives of Surgery
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1997-02-01
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 200
- ISSN
- 0004-0010 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2045172869
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Skill Acquisition and Assessment for Laparoscopic Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430260098021
- The paper
- Rosser, J. C. (1997). Skill Acquisition and Assessment for Laparoscopic Surgery. Archives of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430260098021
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.