The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE UNITED STATES PHARMACOPEIA.
Open accessAbstract
It is not my present purpose to add to the many reviews or criticisms of the Pharmacopeia, but to call attention to two conditions, hoping that steps may be taken by this Section looking to their improvement. The first is the general loss of interest on the part of physicians in the revision of the Pharmacopeia. The Pharmacopeia was called into being by physicians in 1820, and in 1850 pharmacists were admitted to the convention; since then physicians have gradually relinquished control to pharmacists, and to-day we are confronted with an anomalous condition, in that the committee of revision of 1900, consisting of twenty-five men, numbered nineteen pharmacists or men identified with pharmaceutic institutions, and but six whose interests were entirely with medicine. For example, Dr. Squibb was almost universally known as a manufacturing pharmacist. Only ten members of the committee of revision had the title of M.D. This condition
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dissolution Media Simulating Conditions in the Proximal Human Gastrointestinal Tract: An Update
Jantratid, E., Janssen, N., Reppas, C., & Dressman, J. B. (2008) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-008-9569-4 · Cited by 764
In vitro–in vivo correlations for lipophilic, poorly water-soluble drugs
Dressman, J. B., & Reppas, C. (2000) · European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0928-0987(00)00181-0 · Cited by 579
D'Emanuele, A., Jevprasesphant, R., Penny, J., & Attwood, D. (2004) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2003.12.006 · Cited by 269
Colombo, M., Figueiró, F., de Fraga Dias, A., Teixeira, H. F., Battastini, A. M. O., & Koester, L. S. (2018) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.03.055 · Cited by 157
Amann, L. C., Gandal, M. J., Lin, R., Liang, Y., & Siegel, S. J. (2010) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1007/s11095-010-0152-4 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- HATCHER, R. A.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1908-01-04
- Volume
- L
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 30
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2016031616
- Cited by
- 1,258
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE UNITED STATES PHARMACOPEIA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1908.25310270030002f
- The paper
- HATCHER, R. A. (1908). THE UNITED STATES PHARMACOPEIA. Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1908.25310270030002f
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
