Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Thrombophlebitis and Cancer

Lieberman, Jerrold S.·1961·JAMA

Abstract

Records of 1,400 patients with the diagnosis of venous thrombosis or thrombophlebitis were reviewed. Eighty-one had associated cancer. In 61, the thrombophlebitis was diagnosed clinically; in 20, at autopsy. Fifty-one had carcinoma. Thrombophlebitis was recognized in 31 prior to the carcinoma. Other types of malignancy also showed this relationship. The lungs, female reproductive tract, and the pancreas were most frequent sites for the primary lesion. The resistance to anticoagulant therapy used in the treatment of thrombophlebitis was striking. Phlebitis sometimes persists or recurs over long periods of time before the cancer is discovered. These characteristics should be regarded as warning signs indicating a comprehensive survey for occult cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1961.03040340006002

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 184

Metadata

Authors
Lieberman, J. S.
Venue
JAMA
Published
1961-08-26
Volume
177
Issue
8
Pages
542
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2074535034
Cited by
184
References
0
FWCI
14.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thrombophlebitis and Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1961.03040340006002
The paper
Lieberman, J. S. (1961). Thrombophlebitis and Cancer. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1961.03040340006002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.