Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 229

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effect of Antihypertensive Treatment on Stroke Recurrence: Hypertension-Stroke Cooperative Study Group

·1974·JAMA

Abstract

Four hundred fifty-two stroke survivors with recumbent blood pressures ranging from 140 to 220 mm Hg systolic and 90 to 115 mm Hg diastolic (average, 167/100 mm Hg) were followed up for a mean period of three years; half the patients received an antihypertensive drug and half received placebo. The hypothesis that antihypertensive therapy for hypertensive stroke survivors would alter the stroke recurrence rate was not statistically supported by the data. No statistically significant reduction occurred in the number of endpoints due to cardiovascular disease except for congestive heart failure, in which the drug-treated group exhibited a statistically significant reduction. (JAMA229:409-418, 1974)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1974.03230420021019

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 229

Metadata

Venue
JAMA
Published
1974-07-22
Volume
229
Issue
4
Pages
409
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W4254416202
Cited by
229
References
0
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Antihypertensive Treatment on Stroke Recurrence: Hypertension-Stroke Cooperative Study Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1974.03230420021019
The paper
Effect of Antihypertensive Treatment on Stroke Recurrence: Hypertension-Stroke Cooperative Study Group. (1974). JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1974.03230420021019

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.