The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial: Risk Factor Changes and Mortality Results
Abstract
The Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial was a randomized primary prevention trial to test the effect of a multifactor intervention program on mortality from coronary heart disease (CHD) in 12,866 high-risk men aged 35 to 57 years. Men were randomly assigned either to a special intervention (SI) program consisting of stepped-care treatment for hypertension, counseling for cigarette smoking, and dietary advice for lowering blood cholesterol levels, or to their usual sources of health care in the community (UC). Over an average follow-up period of seven years, risk factor levels declined in both groups, but to a greater degree for the SI men. Mortality from CHD was 17.9 deaths per 1,000 in the SI group and 19.3 per 1,000 in the UC group, a statistically nonsignificant difference of 7.1% (90% confidence interval, —15% to 25%). Total mortality rates were 41.2 per 1,000 (SI) and 40.4 per 1,000 (UC). Three possible explanations for these findings are considered: (1) the overall intervention program, under these circumstances, does not affect CHD mortality; (2) the intervention used does affect CHD mortality, but the benefit was not observed in this trial of seven years' average duration, with lower-than-expected mortality and with considerable risk factor change in the UC group; and (3) measures to reduce cigarette smoking and to lower blood cholesterol levels may have reduced CHD mortality within subgroups of the SI cohort, with a possibly unfavorable response to antihypertensive drug therapy in certain but not all hypertensive subjects. This last possibility was considered most likely, needs further investigation, and lends support to some preventive measures while requiring reassessment of others. (JAMA1982;248:1465-1477)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Translating Social Ecological Theory into Guidelines for Community Health Promotion
Stokols, D. (1996) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.4278/0890-1171-10.4.282 · Cited by 2,763
Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: Definition and operational criteria
Prentice, R. L. (1989) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4780080407 · Cited by 2,057
PLEIOTROPIC EFFECTS OF STATINS
Liao, J. K., & Laufs, U. (2005) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.45.120403.095748 · Cited by 1,994
Molecular Mechanisms of Human Hypertension
Lifton, R. P., Gharavi, A. G., & Geller, D. S. (2001) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00241-0 · Cited by 1,686
Diet and Health: What Should We Eat?
Willett, W. C. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8160011 · Cited by 1,008
Metadata
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1982-09-24
- Volume
- 248
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1465
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2435772150
- Cited by
- 1,722
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 172.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial: Risk Factor Changes and Mortality Results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1982.03330120023025
- The paper
- Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial: Risk Factor Changes and Mortality Results. (1982). JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1982.03330120023025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.