Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 432

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Predicting Outcome From Hypoxic-lschemic Coma

Levy, David E.·1985·JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association

Abstract

Outcome from coma caused by cerebral hypoxia-ischemia (eg, cardiac arrest) was compared with serial neurological findings in 210 patients. Thirteen percent of patients regained independent function at some point during the first postarrest year. Computer application of new multivariate techniques to the prospectively observed findings generated easily utilized rules that classified patients by likely outcome. At the time of initial examination, 52 patients (one fourth of the total population) had absent pupillary light reflexes, and none of these patients ever regained independent daily function. By contrast, the initial presence of pupillary light reflexes, the development of spontaneous eye movements that were roving conjugate or better, and the findings of extensor, flexor, or withdrawal responses to pain identified a smaller group of 27 patients, 11 (41%) of whom regained independence in their daily lives. By 24 hours after onset, 93 poor-outcome patients were identified by motor responses that were absent, extensor, or flexor and by spontaneous eye movements that were neither orienting nor roving conjugate; only one regained independent function. This contrasts with recovery in 19 (63%) of 30 patients who at that time showed improvement in their eye-opening responses and obeyed commands or had motor responses that were withdrawal or localizing. Similarly simple rules distinguished between good- and poor-prognosis patients on postarrest days 3, 7, and 14. (JAMA1985;253:1420-1426)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1985.03350340072020

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Levy, D. E.
Venue
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Published
1985-03-08
Volume
253
Issue
10
Pages
1420
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W4319292984
Cited by
432
References
0
FWCI
20.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.