The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prevention of Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism
Abstract
Transvenous Greenfield filter insertion is a safe and efficient mechanical means of protection against recurrent pulmonary thromboembolism both in the infrarenal and suprarenal positions. Long-term follow-up to 12 years has demonstrated a consistently high patency rate of 96%, which is independent of concomitant anticoagulant therapy. The incidence of recurrent embolism in patients with filters has not changed over time, and there has been no significant filter migration over prolonged periods of observation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Collins, R., Scrimgeour, A., Yusuf, S., & Peto, R. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198805053181805 · Cited by 1,314
Maternal activity restriction and the prevention of preterm birth
Sciscione, A. C. (2010) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2009.07.005 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Venue
- JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1986-08-08
- Volume
- 256
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 744
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2419582510
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevention of Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1986.03380060070028
- The paper
- Prevention of Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism. (1986). JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1986.03380060070028
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
