Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 325

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Medical Directive: A New Comprehensive Advance Care Document

Emanuel, Linda L., Emanuel, Ezekiel J.·1989·JAMA

Abstract

Living wills have been strongly endorsed in principle. Unfortunately, existing living wills are rarely used in clinical practice because they are vague and difficult to apply. To remedy this, we propose a new advance care document: the Medical Directive. The Medical Directive delineates four paradigmatic scenarios, defined by prognosis and disability of incompetent patients. In each scenario, patients are to indicate their preferences regarding specific life-sustaining interventions. The Medical Directive also provides for the designation of a proxy to make decisions in circumstances where the patient’s preferences are uncertain. Finally, there is a section for a statement of wishes regarding organ donation. The Medical Directive provides an opportunity for significant improvement in the documentation of patients’ preferences regarding life-sustaining care in states of incompetence. As an expression of a patient’s wishes, the Medical Directive should be honored by courts and should facilitate physician-patient discussions of critical and terminal care options.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1989.03420220102036

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Inre Quinlan, 70 NJ 10(1976)
  2. Miles, 1987, Advanced directives to limit treatment: the need for portability., J Am Geriatric Soc, 35, 74, 10.1111/jgs.1987.35.issue-1 · doi:10.1111/jgs.1987.35.issue-1
  3. Reiman, 1979, Michigan’s sensible 'living will’., N Engl J Med, 300, 1270, 10.1056/NEJM197905313002210 · doi:10.1056/nejm197905313002210
  4. Uhlmann, 1987, Medical management decisions in nursing home patients., Aim Intern Med, 106, 879, 10.7326/0003-4819-106-6-879 · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-106-6-879
  5. Shapiro, 1986, Living will in Wisconsin., Wise Med J, 85, 17
  6. Readleaf, 1979, The California natural death act: an empirical study of physicians’ practices., Stanford Law Ren, 31, 913, 10.2307/1228530 · doi:10.2307/1228530
  7. Bok, 1976, Personal directions for care at the end of life., N Engl J Med, 295, 367, 10.1056/NEJM197608122950706 · doi:10.1056/nejm197608122950706
  8. Schneiderman, 1985, Counseling patients to counsel physicians on future care in the event of patient incompetence., Ann Intern Med, 102, 693, 10.7326/0003-4819-102-5-693 · DOI
  9. Paris, 1981, Living will legislation, reconsidered., America, 145, 86
  10. Steiber, 1987, Right to die; public balks at deciding for others., Hospitals, 61, 72
  11. Brennan, 1988, Ethics committees and decisions to limit care: the experience at the Massachusetts General Hospital., JAMA, 260, 803, 10.1001/jama.1988.03410060073030 · doi:10.1001/jama.1988.03410060073030
  12. Caplan, 1985, Living wills and the lessons of organ donations., New Physician, 34, 7
  13. Kapp, 1982, Response to the living will furor: directives for maximum care., Am J Med, 72, 855, 10.1016/0002-9343(82)90842-7 · doi:10.1016/0002-9343(82)90842-7
  14. Annas, 1986, The right of elderly patients to refuse life-sustaining treatment., Mil-bank Quarterly, 64, 95, 10.2307/3349961 · doi:10.2307/3349961
  15. Emanuel, 1988, A review of the ethical and legal aspects of terminating medical care., Am J Med, 84, 291, 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90428-7 · DOI
  16. Fox, 1987, Nora’s living will.’, West J Med, 146, 118
  17. Steinbrook, 1984, Decision making for incompetent patients by designated proxy: Californiabnewlaw., N Engl J Med, 310, 1598, 10.1056/NEJM198406143102411 · DOI
  18. In re Peter, 108 NJ 365 (1987)
  19. Emanuel, 1988, Should physicians withhold life-sustaining care from patients who are not terminally ill?, Lancet, 1, 106, 10.1016/S0140-6736(88)90296-6 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(88)90296-6
  20. Uhlmann, 1988, Physicians and spouses' predictions of elderly patients’ resuscitation preferences., J Gerontology, 43, M115, 10.1093/geronj/43.5.M115 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Steinbrook, 1986, Preferences of homosexual men with AIDS for life-sustaining treatment., N Engl J Med, 314, 457, 10.1056/NEJM198602133140730 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Brophy v New England Sinai Hospital, 398 Mass 417 (1986)
  23. In re Jobes, 108 NJ 394 (1987)
  24. Inre Dinnerstein, 38 NE2d 134 (1978)
  25. In re Spring, 399 NE2d 493 (1979)
  26. In re Conroy, 98 NJ 321 (1985)
  27. Inre O'Connor, No. 312 (NY Court of Appeals, October 14,1988)
  28. In re Gardner, 534 A2d 947 (1987)
  29. Leach v Shapiro, 469 NE2d 1047 (1984)
  30. Emanuel, 1987, Physician liability and taking rights seriously., South Med J, 80, 1416, 10.1097/00007611-198711000-00017 · doi:10.1097/00007611-198711000-00017
  31. Hsiao, 1988, Results and policy implications of the resource-based relative-value study., N Engl J Med, 319, 881, 10.1056/NEJM198809293191330 · doi:10.1056/nejm198809293191330
  32. 1987, Handbook of Living Will Laws: 1987 Edition
  33. 1983, Deciding to Forego Life Sustaining Treatment
  34. Ramsey, 1978, Ethics at the Edges of Life
  35. 1984, A Living Will
  36. 1987, Life-Sustaining Treatments: Making Decisions and Appointing a Health Care Agent

Cited by

See all 325

Metadata

Authors
Emanuel, L. L., & Emanuel, E. J.
Venue
JAMA
Published
1989-06-09
Volume
261
Issue
22
Pages
3288
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2003557270
Cited by
325
References
0
FWCI
40.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Medical Directive: A New Comprehensive Advance Care Document. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1989.03420220102036
The paper
Emanuel, L. L., & Emanuel, E. J. (1989). The Medical Directive: A New Comprehensive Advance Care Document. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1989.03420220102036

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.