The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Screening Mammography: A Missed Clinical Opportunity?: Results of the NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium and National Health Interview Survey Studies
Abstract
Data from seven studies sponsored by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) were used to determine current rates of breast cancer screening and to identify the characteristics of and reasons for women not being screened. All seven studies were population-based surveys of women aged 50 to 74 years without breast cancer. While over 90% of non-Hispanic white respondents had regular sources of medical care, 46% to 76% had had a clinical breast examination within the previous year, and only 25% to 41% had had a mammogram. Less educated and poorer women had had fewer mammograms. The two most common reasons women gave for never having had a mammogram were that they did not know they needed it and that their physician had not recommended it. Many physicians may have overlooked the opportunity to recommend mammography for older women when performing a clinical breast examination and to educate their patients about the benefit of screening mammography. (JAMA. 1990;264:54-58)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Contribution of Primary Care to Health Systems and Health
STARFIELD, B., SHI, L., & MACINKO, J. (2005) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x · Cited by 5,507
Psychological and Behavioral Implications of Abnormal Mammograms
Lerman, C., Track, B., Rimer, B. K., Boyce, A., Jepson, C., & Engstrom, P. F. (1991) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-114-8-657 · Cited by 481
Using an office system intervention to increase breast cancer screening
Kinsinger, L. S., Harris, R., Qaqish, B., Strecher, V., & Kaluzny, A. (1998) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00160.x · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1990-07-04
- Volume
- 264
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 54
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W4246588623
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Screening Mammography: A Missed Clinical Opportunity?: Results of the NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium and National Health Interview Survey Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1990.03450010058030
- The paper
- Screening Mammography: A Missed Clinical Opportunity?: Results of the NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium and National Health Interview Survey Studies. (1990). JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1990.03450010058030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.