The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Influence of Clinical Knowledge, Organizational Context, and Practice Style on Transfusion Decision Making: Implications for Practice Change Strategies
Open accessAbstract
Evidence shows that blood products, like other health care resources, are often used inappropriately, but the reasons for this have not been well studied. We conducted a face-to-face survey of 122 general surgeons, orthopedic surgeons, and anesthesiologists in three hospitals to evaluate the influence of several clinical and nonclinical factors on transfusion decision making. We found widespread deficiencies in physicians' knowledge of transfusion risks and indications. Each transfusion risk was estimated correctly by fewer than half of the physicians surveyed, and only 31% responded correctly to a set of four questions regarding transfusion indications. Attending physicians routinely had lower knowledge scores than did residents, yet they exhibited more confidence in their knowledge. Residents' transfusion decisions, however, were strongly influenced by the desires of their attending physicians, resulting in their ordering potentially inappropriate transfusions. Of the residents surveyed, 61% indicated that they ordered transfusions that they judged unnecessary at least once a month because a more senior physician suggested that they do so. These findings provide insights for the development of strategies to improve transfusion practices, which would address the dual concerns of quality of care and cost containment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Effects of a Smoking Cessation Intervention on 14.5-Year Mortality: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Anthonisen, N. R., Skeans, M. A., Wise, R. A., Manfreda, J., Kanner, R. E., Connett, J. E., & for the Lung Health Study Research Group* (2005) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-142-4-200502150-00005 · Cited by 1,237
Corwin, H. L., Parsonnet, K. C., & Gettinger, A. (1995) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.108.3.767 · Cited by 358
Prudent Strategies for Elective Red Blood Cell Transfusion
Welch, H. G., Meehan, K. R., & Goodnough, L. T. (1992) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-116-5-393 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Salem-Schatz, S. R.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1990-07-25
- Volume
- 264
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 476
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W4246704422
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of Clinical Knowledge, Organizational Context, and Practice Style on Transfusion Decision Making: Implications for Practice Change Strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1990.03450040072034
- The paper
- Salem-Schatz, S. R. (1990). Influence of Clinical Knowledge, Organizational Context, and Practice Style on Transfusion Decision Making: Implications for Practice Change Strategies. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1990.03450040072034
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.