Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 604

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers

Andersen, Ronald·1991·JAMA

Abstract

We learned in our civics classes that the federal government has three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial. In practice, observers of the governmental process have long recognized the importance of a fourth branch—the regulatory agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which have much to do with interpreting laws, writing regulations, and enforcing them. The proliferation of science and technology and the resulting products and services have led these agencies to seek expert, scientific advice concerning health, safety, and environmental policy. Sheila Jasanoff views the scientific advisory process as so pervasive and influential that she has labeled it "the fifth branch." These scientific advisers play central roles in determining whether we should "eat supermarket apples, use hair spray, drive cars in inner cities, incinerate our wastes, generate nuclear energy, [or] release genetically engineered organisms into the environment" (p v). Despite this influence,

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1991.03460180121046

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 604

Metadata

Authors
Andersen, R.
Venue
JAMA
Published
1991-05-08
Volume
265
Issue
18
Pages
2413
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2027580705
Cited by
604
References
0
FWCI
21.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1991.03460180121046
The paper
Andersen, R. (1991). The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1991.03460180121046

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.