The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers
Abstract
We learned in our civics classes that the federal government has three branches: executive, legislative, and judicial. In practice, observers of the governmental process have long recognized the importance of a fourth branch—the regulatory agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which have much to do with interpreting laws, writing regulations, and enforcing them. The proliferation of science and technology and the resulting products and services have led these agencies to seek expert, scientific advice concerning health, safety, and environmental policy. Sheila Jasanoff views the scientific advisory process as so pervasive and influential that she has labeled it "the fifth branch." These scientific advisers play central roles in determining whether we should "eat supermarket apples, use hair spray, drive cars in inner cities, incinerate our wastes, generate nuclear energy, [or] release genetically engineered organisms into the environment" (p v). Despite this influence,
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
How science makes environmental controversies worse
Sarewitz, D. (2004) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001 · Cited by 1,194
Gauchat, G. (2012) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122412438225 · Cited by 1,091
Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder
Norgaard, R. B. (2010) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.009 · Cited by 1,011
Clark, W. C., Tomich, T. P., van Noordwijk, M., Guston, D., Catacutan, D., Dickson, N. M., & McNie, E. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0900231108 · Cited by 568
Expert‐Based Information and Policy Subsystems: A Review and Synthesis
Weible, C. M. (2008) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00287.x · Cited by 470
Metadata
- Authors
- Andersen, R.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1991-05-08
- Volume
- 265
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 2413
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2027580705
- Cited by
- 604
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1991.03460180121046
- The paper
- Andersen, R. (1991). The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1991.03460180121046
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.