The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Patient-Controlled Analgesia: Does a Concurrent Opioid Infusion Improve Pain Management After Surgery?
Abstract
Objective. —To assess the influence of a continuous (basal) morphine infusion as part of a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) system on the postoperative analgesic requirement and on recovery parameters following abdominal hysterectomy. Design. —Single-center, randomized, controlled protocol. Setting. —University medical center. Participants. —A total of 230 adult women were randomly assigned to receive no morphine infusion (control group) or a continuous 0.5-, 1.0-, or 2.0-mg/h morphine infusion. Each patient was able to self-administer supplemental intravenous bolus doses of morphine (1 to 2 mg) using a PCA infuser. Main Outcome Measures. —Use of the PCA device, opioid-related side effects, recovery times, and the patients' assessment of pain and sedation on linear visual analog scales were recorded during the 72-hour study period. Follow-up questionnaires were completed by the patients and their health care professionals to assess the overall adequacy of PCA therapy. Results. —Patients who received the 2-mg/h morphine infusions received significantly more opioid medication 9 to 72 hours after their operation than those who received no infusion (control group). The presence of a continuous morphine infusion of 0.5 to 2 mg/h did not significantly decrease the number of patient demands or supplemental bolus doses administered compared with the control group. Overall, 168 (84%) of the 199 patients who completed the 72-hour study were able to achieve adequate analgesia without requiring changes in the PCA regimen or experiencing major side effects. Recovery times and outcome variables were similar in all four groups. Conclusion. —The routine use of a continuous opioid infusion in combination with a standard PCA regimen does not improve pain management compared with PCA alone after abdominal hysterectomy. (JAMA. 1991;266:1947-1952)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Chou, R., Gordon, D. B., de Leon-Casasola, O. A., Rosenberg, J. M., Bickler, S., Brennan, T., Carter, T., Cassidy, C. L., Chittenden, E. H., Degenhardt, E., et al. (2016) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2015.12.008 · Cited by 3,171
White, P. F., Kehlet, H., Neal, J. M., Schricker, T., Carr, D. B., & Carli, F. (2007) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/01.ane.0000263034.96885.e1 · Cited by 485
Optimizing pain management to facilitate Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathways
Tan, M., Law, L. S.-C., & Gan, T. J. (2015) · Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie · doi:10.1007/s12630-014-0275-x · Cited by 358
Intraoperative high dose fentanyl induces postoperative fentanyl tolerance
Chia, Y.-Y., Liu, K., Wang, J.-J., Kuo, M.-C., & Ho, S.-T. (1999) · Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie · doi:10.1007/bf03012978 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Parker, R. K.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1991-10-09
- Volume
- 266
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1947
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W4317639062
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patient-Controlled Analgesia: Does a Concurrent Opioid Infusion Improve Pain Management After Surgery? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1991.03470140059024
- The paper
- Parker, R. K. (1991). Patient-Controlled Analgesia: Does a Concurrent Opioid Infusion Improve Pain Management After Surgery? JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1991.03470140059024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.