The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evidence for the Effects of HIV Antibody Counseling and Testing on Risk Behaviors
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review published abstracts, journal articles, and presentations for evidence of the effects of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody counseling and testing on risk behaviors. Studies reviewed focused on homosexual men, intravenous drug users in treatment programs, pregnant women, and other heterosexuals. DATA SOURCES: Peer-reviewed journals (January 1986 through July 1990) and published abstracts and oral presentations from the second (1986) through the sixth (1990) International Conferences on AIDS. STUDY SELECTION: We identified 66 studies that included data on the behavioral effects of HIV antibody counseling and testing. By consensus of the authors, 16 of these were excluded because of small sample size or inadequate study design. DATA EXTRACTION: Studies were assessed by the authors according to methodological strength (sample selection, inclusion of appropriate comparison groups, and inclusion of statistical tests of significance). DATA SYNTHESIS: All longitudinal studies of homosexual men reported reductions in risky behavior among both tested and untested men, and a few reported greater decreases among seropositive men than among seronegative men and those untested or unaware of their serostatus. For intravenous drug users in treatment, we found reductions in intravenous drug use and sexual risk behaviors regardless of counseling and testing experience. We found little evidence for the impact of counseling and testing on pregnancy and/or pregnancy termination rates for either seropositive or seronegative high-risk women. We noted substantial risk reduction among heterosexual couples with one infected partner. Findings among other heterosexuals at increased risk were scanty and mixed. CONCLUSIONS: Further studies should specifically address the behavioral consequences of counseling and testing in various settings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kamb, M. L., Fishbein, M., Douglas, Jr., Rhodes, F., Rogers, J., Bolan, G., Zenilman, J., Hoxworth, T., Malotte, C. K., Iatesta, M., et al. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.13.1161 · Cited by 973
Burton, J., Darbes, L. A., & Operario, D. (2010) · AIDS and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10461-008-9471-4 · Cited by 303
RITTER, A., & CAMERON, J. (2006) · Drug and Alcohol Review · doi:10.1080/09595230600944529 · Cited by 300
Kalichman, S. C., Greenberg, J., & Abel, G. G. (1997) · AIDS Care · doi:10.1080/09540129750124984 · Cited by 153
Meta-analysis of HIV risk-reduction interventions within drug abuse treatment programs
Prendergast, M. L., Urada, D., & Podus, D. (2001) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.69.3.389 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Higgins, D. L.
- Venue
- JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1991-11-06
- Volume
- 266
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 2419
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2010361572
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence for the Effects of HIV Antibody Counseling and Testing on Risk Behaviors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1991.03470170107033
- The paper
- Higgins, D. L. (1991). Evidence for the Effects of HIV Antibody Counseling and Testing on Risk Behaviors. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1991.03470170107033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.