The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing for Abuse During Pregnancy: Severity and Frequency of Injuries and Associated Entry Into Prenatal Care
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the occurrence, frequency, and severity of physical abuse during pregnancy and associated initiation of prenatal care. DESIGN: Stratified, prospective cohort analysis. SETTING: Public prenatal clinics in Houston, Tex, and Baltimore, Md. PARTICIPANTS: Total population-based sample of 691 black, Hispanic, and white pregnant women. All of the women were urban residents and most of the Hispanic women were Mexican American. All participants were invited into the study at the first prenatal visit and were followed up until delivery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Identification of abuse status. RESULTS: A three-question Abuse Assessment Screen detected a 17% (1/6) prevalence of physical or sexual abuse during pregnancy, which is more than double all previous published reports. When evaluated against nationally tested research instruments, the three-question screen that was asked at the first prenatal visit was sensitive and specific to abuse status. Abuse was recurrent, with 60% of abused women reporting two or more episodes of assault. Location of abuse focused on the head. Frequency and severity of abuse and potential danger of homicide was appreciably worse for white women. Abused women were twice as likely as nonabused women to begin prenatal care during the third trimester. CONCLUSIONS: A simple clinical assessment screen completed by the health care provider in a private setting and with the male partner absent is as effective as research instruments in identifying abused women. Straightforward, routine clinical assessment is recommended as essential in preventing potential trauma, interrupting existing abuse, and protecting health.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Societal change and change in family violence from 1975 to 1985 as revealed by two national surveys
Straus, M. A., & Gelles, R. J. (1986) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/352033 · Cited by 1,592
Cited by
Physical health consequences of physical and psychological intimate partner violence
Coker, A. L. (2000) · Archives of Family Medicine · doi:10.1001/archfami.9.5.451 · Cited by 1,166
Wingood, G. M., & DiClemente, R. J. (2000) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/109019810002700502 · Cited by 981
Clinical Characteristics of Women With a History of Childhood Abuse: Unhealed Wounds
McCauley, J. (1997) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540410040028 · Cited by 904
Beydoun, H. A., Beydoun, M. A., Kaufman, J. S., Lo, B., & Zonderman, A. B. (2012) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.04.025 · Cited by 680
Social Support Protects against the Negative Effects of Partner Violence on Mental Health
Coker, A. L., Smith, P. H., Thompson, M. P., McKeown, R. E., Bethea, L., & Davis, K. E. (2002) · Journal of Women's Health & Gender-Based Medicine · doi:10.1089/15246090260137644 · Cited by 669
Metadata
- Authors
- McFarlane, J.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1992-06-17
- Volume
- 267
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 3176
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W1972749077
- Cited by
- 1,001
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 36.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing for Abuse During Pregnancy: Severity and Frequency of Injuries and Associated Entry Into Prenatal Care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1992.03480230068030
- The paper
- McFarlane, J. (1992). Assessing for Abuse During Pregnancy: Severity and Frequency of Injuries and Associated Entry Into Prenatal Care. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03480230068030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.