Cited by 129Pediatric health and respiratory diseasesRespiratory viral infections researchHerbal Medicine Research Studies

Over-the-counter Cold Medications: A Critical Review of Clinical Trials Between 1950 and 1991

Smith, Michael B. H.·1993·JAMA

Abstract

Objective. —To determine whether over-the-counter cold medications have been shown to be effective in relieving symptoms in children, adolescents, and adults. Data Sources. —The MEDLINE database using the key words combined with medications and research and review articles. Articles were retrieved if they were written in English and published between January 1950 and January 1991. Study Selection. —Articles were selected if they described a controlled clinical trial on the treatment of the common cold. Forty-eight percent of 106 articles met the selection criteria, and these were grouped by age into child studies (<5 years old and <12 years old) and adolescent (aged 12 years and older)/adult studies. Data Extraction. —Each article was scored on 11 criteria to determine scientific validity. Those articles scoring above 70% were included in the final analysis. Two authors independently scored a sample of articles to determine interrater reliability. Data Synthesis. —Very few studies have been performed on children. Of those, two done on preschool children demonstrated no symptom relief, whereas two done on older children showed some benefit. In the adolescent/adult studies, chlorpheniramine maleate, pseudoephedrine hydrochloride, oxymetazoline hydrochloride, phenylpropanolamine hydrochloride, ipratropium bromide, and atropine methonitrate all improved nasal symptoms. Combination therapy (using an antihistamine-decongestant mix) was shown to relieve a variety of symptoms. Conclu…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1993.03500170088039

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Smith 1993 concluded that there was very little evidence of effectiveness of OTC cold medications in young children, but that some medications and combinations were effective in adolescents and adults.

    “Smith 1993 extensively reviewed the effectiveness of OTC cold medications and concluded that there was very little evidence of their effectiveness in young children, but that some medications and combinations were effective in adolescents and adults”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 129

Authors
Smith, M. B. H.
Corresponding author
Smith, Michael B. H.
Venue
JAMA
Published
1993-05-05
Volume
269
Issue
17
Pages
2258
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W4242174140
Cited by
129
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
FWCI
11.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
JAMA (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Pediatric health and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Herbal Medicine Research Studies
Keywords
common cold, symptom relief, children, adolescents, adults, chlorpheniramine, pseudoephedrine, oxymetazoline, phenylpropanolamine, ipratropium bromide, atropine methyl nitrate, nasal symptoms, drug effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review