Over-the-counter Cold Medications: A Critical Review of Clinical Trials Between 1950 and 1991
Abstract
Objective. —To determine whether over-the-counter cold medications have been shown to be effective in relieving symptoms in children, adolescents, and adults. Data Sources. —The MEDLINE database using the key words combined with medications and research and review articles. Articles were retrieved if they were written in English and published between January 1950 and January 1991. Study Selection. —Articles were selected if they described a controlled clinical trial on the treatment of the common cold. Forty-eight percent of 106 articles met the selection criteria, and these were grouped by age into child studies (<5 years old and <12 years old) and adolescent (aged 12 years and older)/adult studies. Data Extraction. —Each article was scored on 11 criteria to determine scientific validity. Those articles scoring above 70% were included in the final analysis. Two authors independently scored a sample of articles to determine interrater reliability. Data Synthesis. —Very few studies have been performed on children. Of those, two done on preschool children demonstrated no symptom relief, whereas two done on older children showed some benefit. In the adolescent/adult studies, chlorpheniramine maleate, pseudoephedrine hydrochloride, oxymetazoline hydrochloride, phenylpropanolamine hydrochloride, ipratropium bromide, and atropine methonitrate all improved nasal symptoms. Combination therapy (using an antihistamine-decongestant mix) was shown to relieve a variety of symptoms. Conclu…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Smith 1993 concluded that there was very little evidence of effectiveness of OTC cold medications in young children, but that some medications and combinations were effective in adolescents and adults.
“Smith 1993 extensively reviewed the effectiveness of OTC cold medications and concluded that there was very little evidence of their effectiveness in young children, but that some medications and combinations were effective in adolescents and adults”
From Oral antihistamine-decongestant-analgesic combinations for the common cold (2022) · cites this paper as Smith 1993
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 129
- Authors
- Smith, M. B. H.
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Michael B. H.
- ORCID
- Smith, Michael B. H.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1993-05-05
- Volume
- 269
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 2258
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W4242174140
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 11.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Pediatric health and respiratory diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Herbal Medicine Research Studies
- Keywords
- common cold, symptom relief, children, adolescents, adults, chlorpheniramine, pseudoephedrine, oxymetazoline, phenylpropanolamine, ipratropium bromide, atropine methyl nitrate, nasal symptoms, drug effectiveness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review