The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ophthalmic Examination Among Adults With Diagnosed Diabetes Mellitus
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether adults with diagnosed diabetes in the United States are receiving recommended eye examinations for detection of diabetic retinopathy and what factors are associated with receiving them. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The design was a cross-sectional survey of the civilian, noninstitutionalized US population 18 years of age or older, based on the 1989 National Health Interview Survey. A multistage probability sampling strategy was used to identify a representative sample of 84,572 persons. A questionnaire on diabetes was administered to all subjects with diagnosed diabetes (n = 2405). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: A dilated eye examination in the past year. MAIN RESULTS: Of all adults with diagnosed diabetes in the United States, only 49% had a dilated eye examination in the past year. This included 57% of people with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), 55% with insulin-treated non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), and 44% with NIDDM not treated with insulin. Even among diabetics at high risk of vision loss because of retinopathy or long duration of diabetes, the proportion with a dilated eye examination was only 61% and 57%, respectively. By logistic regression, the probability of a dilated eye examination among persons with NIDDM increased with older age, higher socioeconomic status, and having attended a diabetes education class. The probability of a dilated eye examination was not independently related to race, duration of diabetes, frequency of physician visits for diabetes, or health insurance. CONCLUSIONS: About half of adults with diabetes in the United States are not receiving timely and recommended eye care to detect and treat retinopathy. Widespread interventions, including patient and professional education, are needed to ensure that diabetic patients who are not receiving appropriate eye care have an annual dilated eye examination to detect retinopathy and prevent vision loss.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Klein, R. (1984) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.1984.01040030398010 · Cited by 1,885
Current estimates from the National Health Interview Survey.
Ss, J. (1981) · PubMed · Cited by 1,866
Klein, R. (1984) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.1984.01040030405011 · Cited by 1,477
Onset of NIDDM occurs at Least 4–7 yr Before Clinical Diagnosis
Harris, M. I., Klein, R., Welborn, T. A., & Knuiman, M. W. (1992) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.15.7.815 · Cited by 1,306
Harris, M. I., Hadden, W. C., Knowler, W. C., & Bennett, P. H. (1987) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diab.36.4.523 · Cited by 1,096
Patz, A., Fine, S., Finkelstein, D., Prout, T., Aiello, L., Bradley, R., Briones, J. C., Myers, F., Bresnick, G., de Venecia, G., et al. (1978) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(78)35693-1 · Cited by 652
Self-report and medical record report agreement of selected medical conditions in the elderly.
Bush, T. L., Miller, S. R., Golden, A. L., & Hale, W. E. (1989) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.79.11.1554 · Cited by 465
RELIABILITY OF RECALL OF DRUG USAGE AND OTHER HEALTH-RELATED INFORMATION1
HILL, A. P., & ROSS, R. K. (1982) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113386 · Cited by 315
Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy
Singer, D. E., Nathan, D. M., Fogel, H. A., & Schachat, A. P. (1992) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-116-8-660 · Cited by 292
Klein, R., Klein, B. E. K., Neider, M. W., Hubbard, L. D., Meuer, S. M., & Brothers, R. J. (1985) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(85)34003-4 · Cited by 229
Cited by
The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States
McGlynn, E. A., Asch, S. M., Adams, J., Keesey, J., Hicks, J., DeCristofaro, A., & Kerr, E. A. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa022615 · Cited by 5,079
Williams, M. V., Baker, D. W., Parker, R. M., & Nurss, J. R. (1998) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.158.2.166 · Cited by 1,157
How Good Is the Quality of Health Care in the United States?
Schuster, M. A., McGlynn, E. A., & Brook, R. H. (1998) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1468-0009.00105 · Cited by 908
Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema
Ciulla, T. A., Amador, A. G., & Zinman, B. (2003) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.26.9.2653 · Cited by 836
Cost-Effectiveness of Detecting and Treating Diabetic Retinopathy
Javitt, J. C., & Aiello, L. P. (1996) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-124-1_part_2-199601011-00017 · Cited by 411
Metadata
- Authors
- Brechner, R. J.
- Venue
- JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1993-10-13
- Volume
- 270
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1714
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W1971325624
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 9.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ophthalmic Examination Among Adults With Diagnosed Diabetes Mellitus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1993.03510140074032
- The paper
- Brechner, R. J. (1993). Ophthalmic Examination Among Adults With Diagnosed Diabetes Mellitus. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1993.03510140074032
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.