Cited by 114Clinical practice guidelines implementationHealth Sciences Research and EducationHealthcare cost, quality, practices

Guidelines You Can Follow and Can Trust: An Ideal and an Example

McDonald, Clement J.·1994·JAMA

Abstract

Guidelines are popular these days. They are mentioned in journal articles, 1-3 editorials, 4 insurance company contracts, and federal legislation. The Institute of Medicine has dedicated two reports to the subject. 5,6 Unfortunately, the word guideline covers a broad spectrum of intellectual products. Some are hard to follow. They use weasel words instead of numeric thresholds or explicit criteria at their decision points and do not really tell you what to do. We say these are not decidable . Drug package inserts are notorious: Serum electrolytes (particularly potassium), CO 2 , creatinine and BUN should be determined frequently during the first few months of Lasix therapy and periodically thereafter. 7 Guidelines for isoniazid prophylaxis, in contrast, are explicit and easy to follow. 8 Some are simple, describing the indications for a single action and requiring access to only a few variables for their execution. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1994.03510350082042

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GRADE emphasizes the importance of phrasing recommendations using active language and avoiding ambiguous or unclear wording.

    “GRADE emphasizes the importance of phrasing recommendations using active language and of avoiding ambiguous or unclear wording, such as ‘if clinically appropriate’ or ‘if necessary’ [7].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 114

Authors
McDonald, C. J.
Corresponding author
McDonald, Clement J.
Venue
JAMA
Published
1994-03-16
Volume
271
Issue
11
Pages
872
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W1981848174
Cited by
114
References
22
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
21.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
Keywords
guideline quality, guideline implementation, decision criteria, drug package inserts, isoniazid preventive therapy, Institute of Medicine report
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review