Guidelines You Can Follow and Can Trust: An Ideal and an Example
Abstract
Guidelines are popular these days. They are mentioned in journal articles, 1-3 editorials, 4 insurance company contracts, and federal legislation. The Institute of Medicine has dedicated two reports to the subject. 5,6 Unfortunately, the word guideline covers a broad spectrum of intellectual products. Some are hard to follow. They use weasel words instead of numeric thresholds or explicit criteria at their decision points and do not really tell you what to do. We say these are not decidable . Drug package inserts are notorious: Serum electrolytes (particularly potassium), CO 2 , creatinine and BUN should be determined frequently during the first few months of Lasix therapy and periodically thereafter. 7 Guidelines for isoniazid prophylaxis, in contrast, are explicit and easy to follow. 8 Some are simple, describing the indications for a single action and requiring access to only a few variables for their execution. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GRADE emphasizes the importance of phrasing recommendations using active language and avoiding ambiguous or unclear wording.
“GRADE emphasizes the importance of phrasing recommendations using active language and of avoiding ambiguous or unclear wording, such as ‘if clinically appropriate’ or ‘if necessary’ [7].”
From European guidelines for personality disorders: past, present and future (2019) · cites this paper as [7]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 114
- Authors
- McDonald, C. J.
- Corresponding author
- McDonald, Clement J.
- ORCID
- McDonald, Clement J.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1994-03-16
- Volume
- 271
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 872
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W1981848174
- Cited by
- 114
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 21.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
- Keywords
- guideline quality, guideline implementation, decision criteria, drug package inserts, isoniazid preventive therapy, Institute of Medicine report
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Trials as Topic, Practice Guidelines as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review