The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Contrasting Effects of Dopamine and Norepinephrine on Systemic and Splanchnic Oxygen Utilization in Hyperdynamic Sepsis
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of dopamine and norepinephrine on systemic and splanchnic oxygen utilization in patients with hyperdynamic sepsis. DESIGN: A randomized short-term, interventional study. SETTING: An intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty septic patients with a cardiac index greater than 3.2 L-min-1.m-2 and either a mean arterial pressure (MAP) less than 60 mm Hg or a systemic vascular resistance index less than 1200 dyne.s.cm-5.m-2. METHODS AND INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive an infusion of either dopamine or norepinephrine titrated to increase the MAP to greater than 75 mm Hg. The hemodynamic profile, oxygen delivery, oxygen consumption (determined by indirect calorimetry), and gastric intramucosal pH (pHi) (determined by gastric tonometry) were determined at baseline and after 3 hours of achieving the target MAP. RESULTS: Dopamine increased the MAP largely by increasing the cardiac index whereas norepinephrine increased the MAP by increasing the systemic vascular resistance index while maintaining the cardiac index. Although oxygen delivery and oxygen consumption increased in both groups of patients, the pHi increased significantly in those patients treated with norepinephrine whereas the pHi decreased significantly in those patients receiving dopamine (P < .001, for corrected 3-hour value). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that dopamine may cause an uncompensated increase in splanchnic oxygen requirements in septic patients. Norepinephrine, however, may have a more favorable hemodynamic profile and improve splanchnic tissue oxygen utilization in sepsis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marshall, J. C. (1988) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400270043006 · Cited by 328
Cited by
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
Dellinger, R. P., Levy, M. M., Rhodes, A., Annane, D., Gerlach, H., Opal, S. M., Sevransky, J. E., Sprung, C. L., Douglas, I. S., Jaeschke, R., et al. (2013) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e31827e83af · Cited by 9,694
Comparison of Dopamine and Norepinephrine in the Treatment of Shock
De Backer, D., Biston, P., Devriendt, J., Madl, C., Chochrad, D., Aldecoa, C., Brasseur, A., Defrance, P., Gottignies, P., & Vincent, J.-L. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0907118 · Cited by 1,940
Treating Patients with Severe Sepsis
Wheeler, A. P., & Bernard, G. R. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199901213400307 · Cited by 992
Effects of perfusion pressure on tissue perfusion in septic shock.
LeDoux, D., Astiz, M. E., Carpati, C. M., & Rackow, E. C. (2000) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/00003246-200008000-00007 · Cited by 586
Dubin, A., Pozo, M. O., Casabella, C. A., Pálizas, F., Murias, G., Moseinco, M. C., Kanoore Edul, V. S., Pálizas, F., Estenssoro, E., & Ince, C. (2009) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc7922 · Cited by 466
Metadata
- Authors
- Marik, P. E.
- Venue
- JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1994-11-02
- Volume
- 272
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 1354
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2042672404
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Contrasting Effects of Dopamine and Norepinephrine on Systemic and Splanchnic Oxygen Utilization in Hyperdynamic Sepsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1994.03520170064037
- The paper
- Marik, P. E. (1994). The Contrasting Effects of Dopamine and Norepinephrine on Systemic and Splanchnic Oxygen Utilization in Hyperdynamic Sepsis. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1994.03520170064037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.