The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Men Treated for Localized Prostate Cancer
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in men treated for clinically localized prostate cancer. DESIGN: A cross-sectional analysis of HRQOL after treatment with radical prostatectomy, pelvic irradiation, or observation alone for clinically localized prostatic adenocarcinoma, and in age-matched comparison patients. SETTING: A large managed care population in California. SUBJECTS: A total of 528 men, including 214 treated for clinically localized prostate cancer (41 with evidence of metastatic disease were excluded from this analysis) and 273 age-matched, ZIP code-matched comparison patients without prostate cancer. Cancer patients were analyzed in three treatment groups: radical prostatectomy (n = 98), primary pelvic irradiation (n = 56), and observation alone (n = 60). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: General HRQOL was measured with the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. Cancer-specific HRQOL was measured with the CAncer Rehabilitation Evaluation System-Short Form and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General form. Disease-targeted quality of life was measured with a new instrument assessing function and bother in three organ systems: sexual, urinary, and bowel. RESULTS: No differences among treatment groups were seen in comparisons of general HRQOL: Significant differences among treatment groups were seen in both function and bother in the prostate-targeted measures of sexual, urinary, and bowel domains. When cancer patients were compared with men of similar age without prostate cancer, differences were seen in the sexual, urinary, and bowel function and bother but not in general HRQOL measures. Although cancer-free men were found not to have full potency or continence, prostate cancer patients treated with surgery or radiation reported significantly worse sexual, urinary, and bowel function than men without cancer. Men who had undergone nerve-sparing prostatectomy did not differ from those who had undergone standard prostatectomy, but the power to detect a difference was low. CONCLUSIONS: Although no differences were seen in general HRQOL, three disease-targeted domains were found to differ significantly among the treatment groups and comparison patients. Even after controlling for the sexual and urinary dysfunction experienced by older men without cancer, those receiving therapeutic interventions for their prostate cancer were found to have poorer disease-targeted HRQOL: We conclude that in addition to general HRQOL, disease-targeted measures must be used to assess outcomes of care in men treated for localized prostate cancer.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“and for some men will impact their decision to undergo treatment at all.7, 8, 9”
From Preliminary Development of a Mindfulness-Based Group Therapy to Expand Couples’ Sexual Intimacy after Prostate Cancer: A Mixed Methods Approach (2021) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“Side effects of PC treatments impact the sexual lives of men and their partners, including erectile dysfunction, climacturia (loss of urine with ejaculation), anorgasmia (inability to reach orgasm), urinary or fecal incontinence, penile shortening, and/or loss of sexual desire.1,3, 4, 5, 6,8,12”
From Preliminary Development of a Mindfulness-Based Group Therapy to Expand Couples’ Sexual Intimacy after Prostate Cancer: A Mixed Methods Approach (2021) · cites this paper as [8]
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 33,716
The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods
Melzack, R. (1975) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(75)90044-5 · Cited by 6,873
The rand 36‐item health survey 1.0
Hays, R. D., Sherbourne, C. D., & Mazel, R. M. (1993) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.4730020305 · Cited by 2,971
Self-citationA Critical Appraisal of the Quality of Quality-of-Life Measurements
Gill, T. M. (1994) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03520080061045 · Cited by 2,209
Generic and Disease-Specific Measures in Assessing Health Status and Quality of Life
Patrick, D. L., & Deyo, R. A. (1989) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198903001-00018 · Cited by 1,779
Impotence Following Radical Prostatectomy: Insight into Etiology and Prevention
Walsh, P. C., & Donker, P. J. (2016) · The Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2016.10.105 · Cited by 1,467
Boring, C. C., Squires, T. S., Tong, T., & Montgomery, S. (1994) · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.44.1.7 · Cited by 1,313
Patient-re ported complications and follow-up treatment after radical prostatectomy
Fowler, F. J., Barry, M. J., Lu‐Yao, G. L., Roman, A., Wasson, J. H., & Wennberg, J. E. (1993) · Urology · doi:10.1016/0090-4295(93)90524-e · Cited by 627
Liang, M. H., Larson, M. G., Cullen, K. E., & Schwartz, J. A. (1985) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.1780280513 · Cited by 587
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quality of Life and Satisfaction with Outcome among Prostate-Cancer Survivors
Sanda, M. G., Dunn, R. L., Michalski, J. M., Sandler, H. M., Northouse, L., Hembroff, L. A., Lin, X., Greenfield, T. K., Litwin, M. S., Saigal, C. S., et al. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa074311 · Cited by 2,252
Self-citationWei, J. T., Dunn, R. L., Litwin, M. S., Sandler, H. M., & Sanda, M. G. (2000) · Urology · doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00858-x · Cited by 1,520
Self-citationUrinary and Sexual Function After Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
Stanford, J. L., Feng, Z., Hamilton, A. S., Gilliland, F. D., Stephenson, R. A., Eley, J. W., Albertsen, P. C., Harlan, L. C., & Potosky, A. L. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.3.354 · Cited by 1,187
Guideline for the Management of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: 2007 Update
Thompson, I. M., Thrasher, J. B., Aus, G., Burnett, A. L. “., Canby‐Hagino, E., Cookson, M. S., D'Amico, A. V., Dmochowski, R. R., Eton, D. T., Forman, J. D., et al. (2007) · The Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.003 · Cited by 1,112
Heidenreich, A., Joaquim Bellmunt, B., Bolla, M., Joniau, S., Matveev, V. B., Mottet, N., Wiegel, T., & Zattoni, F. (2013) · Cited by 869
Metadata
- Authors
- Litwin, M. S., Hays, R. D., Fink, A., Ganz, P. A., Leake, B., Leach, G. E., & Brook, R. H.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1995-01-11
- Volume
- 273
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 129
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W1978663841
- Cited by
- 1,020
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 50.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
- Keywords
- localized prostate cancer, health-related quality of life, radical prostatectomy, pelvic radiotherapy, active surveillance, sexual dysfunction, urinary dysfunction, bowel dysfunction, nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy, cancer-specific quality of life, RAND-36, FACT-G
- MeSH terms
- Adenocarcinoma, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Intestines, Male, Prostatectomy, Prostatic Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Radiotherapy, Sexual Behavior, Urinary Tract, Matched-Pair Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review