The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Initial Experience With Partial Liquid Ventilation in Adult Patients With the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of partial liquid ventilation (PLV). DESIGN: Before-after trial. SETTING: The surgical intensive care unit at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, from April to December 1994. PATIENTS: A consecutive sample of 10 patients aged 19 to 55 years with the acute respiratory distress syndrome who were receiving extracorporeal life support. INTERVENTION: Perflubron was administered into the trachea until the dependent zone of the lung was filled. Gas ventilation of the perflubron-filled lung was then performed (PLV). Volatilized perflubron replacement was repeated daily for from 1 to 7 days with a median cumulative dose of 38 mL/kg (range, 15 to 62 mL/kg). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physiologic shunt and static pulmonary compliance. RESULTS: Physiologic shunt decreased from a median of 0.72 (range, 0.37 to 1.0) to 0.46 (range, 0.21 to 0.96) over the 72 hours following initiation of PLV (P = .01 by repeated measures analysis of variance). Static pulmonary compliance corrected for patient weight increased from a median of 0.16 mL/cm H2O per kilogram (range, 0.01 to 0.48 mL/cm H2O per kilogram) to 0.27 mL/cm H2O per kilogram (range, 0.05 to 1.11 mL/cm H2O per kilogram) over the same time period (P = .04 by repeated measures analysis of variance). Overall survival was five (50%) of 10 patients. Complications that were potentially associated with PLV included pneumothorax development in one patient and mucus plug formation in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Perflubron may be safely administered into the lungs of patients with severe respiratory failure receiving extracorporeal life support and may be associated with improvement in gas exchange and pulmonary compliance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Survival of Mammals Breathing Organic Liquids Equilibrated with Oxygen at Atmospheric Pressure
Clark, L. C., & Gollan, F. (1966) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.152.3730.1755 · Cited by 794
Cited by
The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Matthay, M. A. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199605303342209 · Cited by 4,923
The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Ware, L. B., & Matthay, M. A. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200005043421806 · Cited by 4,666
Multiple System Organ Failure: Is Mechanical Ventilation a Contributing Factor?
SLUTSKY, A. S., & TREMBLAY, L. N. (1998) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.157.6.9709092 · Cited by 836
Riess, J. G. (2001) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr970143c · Cited by 773
Metadata
- Authors
- Hirschl, R. B.
- Venue
- JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1996-02-07
- Volume
- 275
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 383
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2028072481
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 39.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Initial Experience With Partial Liquid Ventilation in Adult Patients With the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1996.03530290053037
- The paper
- Hirschl, R. B. (1996). Initial Experience With Partial Liquid Ventilation in Adult Patients With the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1996.03530290053037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.