The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nosocomial Pneumonia and Mortality Among Patients in Intensive Care Units
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role that nosocomial pneumonia plays in the outcome of intensive care unit (ICU) patients. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Medical ICU, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France, an academic tertiary care center. PATIENTS: A total of 1978 consecutive patients admitted to the ICU for at least 48 hours. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Various parameters known to be strongly associated with death of ICU patients were recorded: age, location before admission to the ICU, diagnostic categories, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, Simplified Acute Physiologic Score, McCabe score, number and type of dysfunctional organs, and the development of nosocomial bacteremia and nosocomial urinary tract infection. These variables and the presence or absence of nosocomial pneumonia were compared between survivors and nonsurvivors and entered into a stepwise logistic regression model to evaluate their independent prognostic roles. RESULTS: Nosocomial pneumonia developed in 328 patients (16.6%) whose mortality was 52.4% compared with 22.4% for patients without ICU-acquired pneumonia (P < .001), APACHE II score (odds ratio [OR] = 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06 to 1.10; P < .001), number of dysfunctional organs (OR = 1.54; 95% CI, 1.36 to 1.74; P < .001), nosocomial pneumonia (OR = 2.08; 95% CI, 1.55 to 2.80; P < .001), nosocomial bacteremia (OR = 2.51; 95% CI, 1.78 to 3.55; P < .001), ultimately or rapidly fatal underlying disease (OR = 1.76; 95% CI, 1.38 to 2.25; P < .001), and admission from another ICU (OR = 1.30; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.68; P =.04) were significantly associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that, in addition to the severity of underlying medical conditions and nosocomial bacteremia, nosocomial pneumonia independently contributes to ICU patient mortality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Inadequate Antimicrobial Treatment of Infections
Kollef, M. H., Sherman, G., Ward, S., & Fraser, V. J. (1999) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.115.2.462 · Cited by 1,805
Chastre, J., Wolff, M., Fagon, J.-Y., Chevret, S., Thomas, F., Wermert, D., Clementi, E., Gonzalez, J., Jusserand, D., Asfar, P., et al. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.290.19.2588 · Cited by 1,376
Self-citationWisplinghoff, H., Seifert, H., Wenzel, R. P., & Edmond, M. B. (2003) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/374339 · Cited by 687
Does This Patient Have Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia?
Klompas, M. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.297.14.1583 · Cited by 304
Subglottic secretion drainage for preventing ventilator associated pneumonia: A meta-analysis
Frost, S. A., Azeem, A., Alexandrou, E., Tam, V., Murphy, J. K., Hunt, L., O’Regan, W., & Hillman, K. M. (2013) · Australian Critical Care · doi:10.1016/j.aucc.2013.03.003 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Fagon, J.-Y.
- Venue
- JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1996-03-20
- Volume
- 275
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 866
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2049458673
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nosocomial Pneumonia and Mortality Among Patients in Intensive Care Units. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1996.03530350048033
- The paper
- Fagon, J.-Y. (1996). Nosocomial Pneumonia and Mortality Among Patients in Intensive Care Units. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1996.03530350048033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.