The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia in Washington State: Patient Requests and Physician Responses
Abstract
Objectives. —To estimate how often physicians receive requests for physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia and to describe a case series of patient requests for physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia, including physician responses to these requests. Design. —A mailed, anonymous two-part questionnaire. Participants. —A total of 828 physicians returned questionnaires sent to 1453 potential respondents, for a response rate of 57%. Questionnaires were mailed to a random sample (25%) of primary care physicians and all physicians in selected medical subspecialties in Washington State. Main Outcome Measures. —The frequency of explicit patient requests for physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia reported by physicians and individual case descriptions of patient characteristics, physician perceptions of patient concerns, and physician responses to patient requests. Results. —In the past year, 12% of responding physicians received one or more explicit requests for physician-assisted suicide, and 4% received one or more requests for euthanasia. These physicians provided 207 case descriptions. The diagnoses most often associated with requests were cancer, neurological disease, and the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). The patient concerns most often perceived by physicians were worries about loss of control, being a burden, being dependent on others for personal care, and loss of dignity. Physicians provided assistance more often to patients with physical symptoms. Physicians infrequently sought advice from colleagues. Of 156 patients who requested physician-assisted suicide, 38 (24%) received prescriptions, and 21 of these died as a result. Of 58 patients who requested euthanasia, 14 (24%) received parenteral medication and died. Conclusions. —Patient requests for physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia are not rare. As perceived by physicians, the most common patient concerns at the time these requests are made are nonphysical. Physicians occasionally provide these practices, even though they are currently illegal in Washington State. Physicians do not consult colleagues often about these requests. These findings raise the question of how to ensure quality in the evaluation of patient requests for physician-assisted death. (JAMA. 1996;275:919-925)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dignity in the terminally ill: a developing empirical model
Chochinov, H. M., Hack, T., McClement, S., Kristjanson, L., & Harlos, M. (2002) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00084-3 · Cited by 733
Dignity-Conserving Care—A New Model for Palliative Care: Helping the Patient Feel Valued
Chochinov, H. M. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.17.2253 · Cited by 725
van der Maas, P. J., van der Wal, G., Haverkate, I., de Graaff, C. L. M., Kester, J. G. C., Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D., van der Heide, A., Bosma, J. M., & Willems, D. L. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199611283352227 · Cited by 631
Dignity in the terminally ill: a cross-sectional, cohort study
Chochinov, H. M., Hack, T., Hassard, T., Kristjanson, L. J., McClement, S., & Harlos, M. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)12022-8 · Cited by 473
Dying, Dignity, and New Horizons in Palliative End-of-Life Care
Chochinov, H. M. (2006) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.56.2.84 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Back, A. L.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1996-03-27
- Volume
- 275
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 919
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W4327766606
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia in Washington State: Patient Requests and Physician Responses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1996.03530360029034
- The paper
- Back, A. L. (1996). Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia in Washington State: Patient Requests and Physician Responses. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1996.03530360029034
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.