The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prevalence of Violence Against Pregnant Women
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To summarize the methods and findings of studies examining the prevalence of violence against pregnant women and to synthesize these findings by comparing study characteristics for studies with similar and dissimilar results. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, POPLINE, Psychological Abstracts, and Sociological Abstracts databases were searched for all articles pertaining to violence during pregnancy for the period 1963 through August 1995. STUDY SELECTION: Thirteen studies were selected on the basis of specific criteria: a sample with initially unknown violence status; a clear statement of research question(s), with focus on measuring the prevalence of violence; descriptions of the sample, data source, and data collection methods; and data from the United States or another developed country. DATA EXTRACTION: Relevant data were extracted to compare studies by study description, methods, and results. DATA SYNTHESIS: Evidence from the studies we reviewed indicates that the prevalence of violence during pregnancy ranges from 0.9% to 20.1%. Measures of violence, populations sampled, and study methods varied considerably across studies, and these factors may affect prevalence estimates. Studies that asked about violence more than once during detailed in-person interviews or asked later in pregnancy (during the third trimester) reported higher prevalence rates (7.4%-20.1%). The lowest estimate was reported by women who attended a private clinic and responded to a self-administered questionnaire provided to them by a person who was not a health care provider. CONCLUSIONS: Violence may be a more common problem for pregnant women than some conditions for which they are routinely screened and evaluated. Future research that more accurately measures physical violence during pregnancy would contribute to more effective design and implementation of prevention and intervention strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methodological considerations in research on the prevalence of child sexual abuse
Wyatt, G. E., & Peters, S. D. (1986) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/0145-2134(86)90085-2 · Cited by 185
Cited by
Health consequences of intimate partner violence
Campbell, J. C. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08336-8 · Cited by 4,055
Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women
Coker, A. L., Davis, K. E., Arias, I., Desai, S., Sanderson, M., Brandt, H. M., & Smith, P. H. (2002) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00514-7 · Cited by 2,258
Interventions for Violence Against Women: Scientific Review
Wathen, C. N., & MacMillan, H. L. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.5.589 · Cited by 513
Domestic Violence and Perinatal Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Howard, L. M., Oram, S., Galley, H., Trevillion, K., & Feder, G. (2013) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001452 · Cited by 491
Rodriguez, M. A., Bauer, H. M., McLoughlin, E., & Grumbach, K. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.5.468 · Cited by 462
Metadata
- Authors
- Gazmararian, J. A.
- Venue
- JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1996-06-26
- Volume
- 275
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 1915
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W1999674879
- Cited by
- 749
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of Violence Against Pregnant Women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1996.03530480057041
- The paper
- Gazmararian, J. A. (1996). Prevalence of Violence Against Pregnant Women. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1996.03530480057041
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.