Cited by 177Diabetes and associated disordersCeliac Disease Research and ManagementDiabetes Management and Research

Lack of Association Between Early Exposure to Cow's Milk Protein and β-Cell Autoimmunity: Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young (DAISY)

Norris, Jill M.·1996·JAMA

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether infant dietary exposure to cow's milk is associated with beta-cell autoimmunity (BCA), an early predictor of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). SETTING: Denver, Colo. DESIGN: Cross-sectional with retrospective analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Between January 1994 and December 1995, 253 children from 171 families of persons with IDDM were screened for BCA. All children were between the ages of 9 months and 7 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: BCA was defined as elevated levels of insulin autoantibody, glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody, or insulinoma-associated islet tyrosine phosphatases autoantibody (IA-2) above the 99th percentile of 198 normal subjects. RESULTS: Eighteen cases of BCA were detected; 153 unrelated autoantibody-negative children were selected from the cohort as controls. There were no differences in the proportion of cases and controls who were exposed to cow's milk or foods containing cow's milk or to cereal, fruit and vegetable, or meat protein by 3 months or by 6 months of age. Children with BCA were breast-fed for a slightly longer duration than controls (median duration 10 vs 8 months, P=.07). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that early exposure to cow's milk or other dietary protein is not associated with BCA. This calls into question the importance of cow's milk avoidance as a preventive measure for IDDM.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1996.03540080031025

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The evidence linking specific infections with type 1 diabetes remains inconclusive.

    “The evidence linking specific infections with T1D remains inconclusive72.”

    From Epidemiology of type 1 diabetes (2010) · cites this paper as [72]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 177

Authors
Norris, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
Corresponding author
Norris, Jill M.
Venue
JAMA
Published
1996-08-28
Volume
276
Issue
8
Pages
609
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2113002553
Cited by
177
References
26
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK32493, R01DK032493)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
cow's milk protein, infant nutrition, islet autoimmunity, type 1 diabetes, insulin autoantibodies, glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies, IA-2 autoantibodies, breastfeeding
MeSH terms
Animals, Autoantibodies, Breast Feeding, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Dietary Proteins, Female, Glutamate Decarboxylase, HLA Antigens, Humans, Infant, Infant Food, Insulin Antibodies, Islets of Langerhans, Male, Milk, Milk Proteins, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Autoimmunity, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Survival Analysis, Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases, Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review