The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Final Outcome Results of the Multicenter Isradipine Diuretic Atherosclerosis Study (MIDAS): A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Objective. —To compare the rate of progression of mean maximum intimal-medial thickness (IMT) in carotid arteries, using quantitative B-mode ultrasound imaging, during antihypertensive therapy with isradipine vs hydrochlorothiazide. Design. —Randomized, double-blind, positive-controlled trial. Setting. —Nine medical center clinics. Population. —A total of 883 patients with baseline mean ±SD systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP, respectively) of 149.7±16.6 and 96.5±5.1 mm Hg, age of 58.5±8.5 years, and maximum IMT of 1.17±0.20 mm. Interventions. —Twice daily doses of isradipine (2.5-5.0 mg) or hydrochlorothiazide (12.5-25 mg). Main Outcome Measure (Primary End Point). —Rate of progression of mean maximum IMT in 12 carotid focal points over 3 years. Results. —There was no difference in the rate of progression of mean maximum IMT between isradipine and hydrochlorothiazide over 3 years (P=.68). There was a higher incidence of major vascular events (eg, myocardial infarction, stroke, congestive heart failure, angina, and sudden death) in isradipine (n=25; 5.65%) vs hydrochlorothiazide (n=14; 3.17%) (P=.07), and a significant increase in nonmajor vascular events and procedures (eg, transient ischemic attack, dysrhythmia, aortic valve replacement, and femoral popliteal bypass graft) in isradipine (n=40; 9.05%) vs hydrochlorothiazide (n=23; 5.22%) (P=.02). At 6 months, mean DBP decreased by 13.0 mm Hg in both groups, and mean SBP decreased by 19.5 mm Hg in hydrochlorothiazide and 16.0 mm Hg in isradipine (P=.002); the difference in SBP between the 2 groups persisted throughout the study but did not explain the increased incidence of vascular events in patients treated with isradipine. Conclusion. —The rate of progression of mean maximum IMT in carotid arteries, the surrogate end point in this study, did not differ between the 2 treatment groups. The increased incidence of vascular events in patients receiving isradipine compared with hydrochlorothiazide is of concern and should be studied further.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lackland, D. T., Roccella, E. J., Deutsch, A. F., Fornage, M., George, M. G., Howard, G., Kissela, B. M., Kittner, S. J., Lichtman, J. H., Lisabeth, L. D., et al. (2014) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000437068.30550.cf · Cited by 815
Thematic review series: Patient-Oriented Research. Imaging atherosclerosis: state of the art
Crouse, J. R. (2006) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1194/jlr.r600012-jlr200 · Cited by 66
First-line diuretics versus other classes of antihypertensive drugs for hypertension
Reinhart, M., Puil, L., Salzwedel, D. M., & Wright, J. M. (2023) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008161.pub3 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Borhani, N. O.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1996-09-11
- Volume
- 276
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 785
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W4293282543
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.