The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of Neurologic Function in Gulf War Veterans<subtitle>A Blinded Case-Control Study</subtitle>
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether Gulf War-related illnesses are associated with central or peripheral nervous system dysfunction. DESIGN: Nested case-control study. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-three veterans with factor analysis-derived syndromes (the cases), 10 well veterans deployed to the Gulf War (the deployed controls), and 10 well veterans not deployed to the Gulf War (the nondeployed controls). METHOD: With investigators blinded to group identities, participants underwent objective neurophysiological, audiovestibular, neuroradiological, neuropsychological, and blood tests. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Evidence of neurologic dysfunction. RESULTS: Compared with the 20 controls, the 23 cases had significantly more neuropsychological evidence of brain dysfunction on the Halstead Impairment Index (P=.01), greater interside asymmetry of the wave I to wave III interpeak latency of brain stem auditory evoked potentials (P=.02), greater interocular asymmetry of nystagmic velocity on rotational testing, increased asymmetry of saccadic velocity (P=.04), more prolonged interpeak latency of the lumbar-to-cerebral peaks on posterior tibial somatosensory evoked potentials (on right side, P=.03, and on the left side, P=.005), and diminished nystagmic velocity after caloric stimulation bilaterally (P values range from .02 to .04). Cases (n=5) with syndrome 1 ("impaired cognition") were the most impaired on brain stem auditory evoked potentials (P=.005); those (n=13) with syndrome 2 ("confusion-ataxia") were the most impaired on the Halstead Impairment Index (P=.006), rotational testing (P=.01), asymmetry of saccadic velocity (P=.03), and somatosensory evoked potentials (P< or =.01); and those (n=5) with syndrome 3 ("arthro-myo-neuropathy") were the most impaired on caloric stimulation (P< or =.01). CONCLUSIONS: The 3 factor-derived syndromes identified among Gulf War veterans appear to represent variants of a generalized injury to the nervous system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Haley, R. W. (1997) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540270041025 · Cited by 353
Self-citationOrganophosphate-Induced Delayed Polyneuropathy
Lotti, M., & Moretto, A. (2005) · Toxicological Reviews · doi:10.2165/00139709-200524010-00003 · Cited by 340
Haley, R. W. (1997) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540270057027 · Cited by 297
Self-citationProspective study of military service and mortality from ALS
Weisskopf, M. G., O’Reilly, E. J., McCullough, M. L., Calle, E. E., Thun, M. J., Cudkowicz, M., & Ascherio, A. (2005) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000148649.17706.d9 · Cited by 197
Metadata
- Authors
- Haley, R. W.
- Venue
- JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1997-01-15
- Volume
- 277
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 223
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2158223803
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Neurologic Function in Gulf War Veterans<subtitle>A Blinded Case-Control Study</subtitle>. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1997.03540270049026
- The paper
- Haley, R. W. (1997). Evaluation of Neurologic Function in Gulf War Veterans<subtitle>A Blinded Case-Control Study</subtitle>. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03540270049026
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.