The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biological Warfare: A Historical Perspective
Abstract
The deliberate use of microorganisms and toxins as weapons has been attempted throughout history. Biological warfare has evolved from the crude use of cadavers to contaminate water supplies to the development of specialized munitions for battlefield and covert use. The modern development of biological agents as weapons has paralleled advances in basic and applied microbiology. These include the identification of virulent pathogens suitable for aerosol delivery and industrial-scale fermentation processes to produce large quantities of pathogens and toxins. The history of biological warfare is difficult to assess because of a number of confounding factors. These include difficulties in verification of alleged or attempted biological attacks, the use of allegations of biological attacks for propaganda purposes, the paucity of pertinent microbiological or epidemiologic data, and the incidence of naturally occurring endemic or epidemic diseases during hostilities. Biological warfare has been renounced by 140 nations, primarily for strategic and other pragmatic reasons. International diplomatic efforts, including the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention, have not been entirely effective in preventing the enhancement and proliferation of offensive biological warfare programs. The threats posed by biological weapons are likely to continue into the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Edward Jenner and the History of Smallpox and Vaccination
Riedel, S. (2005) · Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings · doi:10.1080/08998280.2005.11928028 · Cited by 964
Anthrax as a Biological Weapon: Medical and Public Health Management
Inglesby, T. V., Henderson, D. A., Bartlett, J. G., Ascher, M. S., Eitzen, E., Friedlander, A. M., Hauer, J., McDade, J., Osterholm, M. T., O'Toole, T., et al. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.281.18.1735 · Cited by 892
Current and Developing Technologies for Monitoring Agents of Bioterrorism and Biowarfare
Lim, D. V., Simpson, J. M., Kearns, E. A., & Kramer, M. F. (2005) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.18.4.583-607.2005 · Cited by 417
Asano, S. (2012) · Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hematopathology · doi:10.3960/jslrt.52.1 · Cited by 169
The Design of Inhibitors for Medicinally Relevant Metalloproteins
Jacobsen, F. E., Lewis, J. A., & Cohen, S. M. (2007) · ChemMedChem · doi:10.1002/cmdc.200600204 · Cited by 132
Metadata
- Authors
- Christopher, L. G. W.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1997-08-06
- Volume
- 278
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 412
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W4322697591
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biological Warfare: A Historical Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1997.03550050074036
- The paper
- Christopher, L. G. W. (1997). Biological Warfare: A Historical Perspective. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03550050074036
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.