The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cancer Incidence After Retinoblastoma: Radiation Dose and Sarcoma Risk
Abstract
Context.-There is a substantial risk of a second cancer for persons with hereditary retinoblastoma, which is enhanced by radiotherapy. Objective.-To examine long-term risk of new primary cancers in survivors of childhood retinoblastoma and quantify the role of radiotherapy in sarcoma development. Design.-Cohort incidence study of patients with retinoblastoma followed for a median of 20 years, and nested case-control study of a radiation dose-response relationship for bone and soft tissue sarcomas. Setting/Participants.-A total of 1604 patients with retinoblastoma who survived at least 1 year after diagnosis, identified from hospital records in Massachusetts and New York during 1914 to 1984. Results.-Incidence of subsequent cancers was statistically significantly elevated only in the 961 patients with hereditary retinoblastoma, in whom 190 cancers were diagnosed, vs 6.3 expected in the general population (relative risk [RR], 30 [95% confidence interval, 26-47]), Cumulative incidence (+/-SE) of a second cancer at 50 years after diagnosis was 51.0% (+/-6.2%) for hereditary retinoblastoma, and 5.0% (+/-3.0%) for nonhereditary retinoblastoma. All 114 sarcomas of diverse histologic types occurred in patients with hereditary retinoblastoma. For soft tissue sarcomas, the RRs showed a stepwise increase at all dose categories, and were statistically significant at 10 to 29.9 Gy and 30 to 59.9 Gy. A radiation risk for all sarcomas combined was evident at doses above 5 Gy, rising to 10.7-fold at doses of 60 Gy or greater (P Conclusions.-Genetic predisposition has a substantial impact on risk of subsequent cancers in retinoblastoma patients, which is further increased by radiation treatment. A radiation dose-response relationship is demonstrated for all sarcomas and, for the first time in humans, for soft tissue sarcomas. Retinoblastoma patients should be examined for new cancers and followed into later life to determine whether their extraordinary cancer risk extends to common cancers of adulthood.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Burningham, Z., Hashibe, M., Spector, L., & Schiffman, J. D. (2012) · Clinical Sarcoma Research · doi:10.1186/2045-3329-2-14 · Cited by 639
Little, J. B. (2000) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/21.3.397 · Cited by 489
Kleinerman, R. A., Tucker, M. A., Tarone, R. E., Abramson, D. H., Seddon, J. M., Stovall, M., Li, F. P., & Fraumeni, J. F. (2005) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2005.05.054 · Cited by 487
Germline and somatic genetics of osteosarcoma — connecting aetiology, biology and therapy
Gianferante, D. M., Mirabello, L., & Savage, S. A. (2017) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2017.16 · Cited by 477
Cancer risks associated with external radiation from diagnostic imaging procedures
Linet, M. S., Slovis, T. L., Miller, D. L., Kleinerman, R., Lee, C., Rajaraman, P., & Berrington de Gonzalez, A. (2012) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21132 · Cited by 420
Metadata
- Authors
- Wong, F. L.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1997-10-15
- Volume
- 278
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1262
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W4254892493
- Cited by
- 486
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer Incidence After Retinoblastoma: Radiation Dose and Sarcoma Risk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.1997.03550150066037
- The paper
- Wong, F. L. (1997). Cancer Incidence After Retinoblastoma: Radiation Dose and Sarcoma Risk. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03550150066037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.