Cited by 451Sleep and related disordersObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Benzodiazepines and Zolpidem for Chronic Insomnia: A Meta-analysis of Treatment Efficacy

Nowell, Peter D.·1997·JAMA

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of benzodiazepines and zolpidem tartrate in chronic insomnia based on a quantitative review of literature. Data sources Articles from 1966 to 1996 were identified using MEDLINE, by a manual review of relevant journals, and from bibliographies of identified articles. Study selection Studies using randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel or crossover designs with benzodiazepines or zolpidem in adults younger than 65 years with chronic insomnia (modified Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria for primary insomnia) were selected for review. Self-report and polysomnographic measures of sleep-onset latency, total sleep time, number of awakenings, and sleep quality were selected as outcomes. Data extraction Twenty-two studies met the selection criteria. A combined test of Pvalues was performed, pooling broadly from the 22 studies to determine whether medication was superior to placebo. A combined test of effect sizes was performed on the subset of studies that reported effect size information to determine the magnitude of medication effect. Data synthesis A homogeneous sample of studies summarized 1894 patients treated for a median duration of 7 days. The combined test of P values demonstrated that medication was superior to placebo in all 4 outcome measures. Treatment response was moderate in magnitude by the combined test of effect sizes. Conclusions Benzodiazepines and zolpidem produced relia…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.1997.03550240060035

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Each of the short/intermediate-acting BzRAs (zaleplon, zolpidem, eszopiclone, triazolam, temazepam) has been shown to have positive effects on sleep latency, TST, and/or WASO in placebo-controlled trials.

    “each has been shown to have posi -tive effects on sleep latency, TST, and/or WASO in placebocontrolled trials. 32-37”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 77 · Cited by 451

Authors
Nowell, P. D.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Nowell, Peter D.
Venue
JAMA
Published
1997-12-24
Volume
278
Issue
24
Pages
2170
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2038637825
Cited by
451
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 33
FWCI
19.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH16804, MH-00295, MH-37869, R01MH037869, T32MH016804)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
chronic insomnia, benzodiazepines, zolpidem, hypnotics, sleep latency, total sleep time, awakening, sleep quality, primary insomnia, drug efficacy, placebo comparison
MeSH terms
Zolpidem, Adult, Benzodiazepines, Chronic Disease, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Middle Aged, Pyridines, Sleep, Statistics as Topic, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review