Cited by 15Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyCholesterol and Lipid Metabolism

<emph type="ital">ABCA1</emph> Gene Mutations, HDL Cholesterol Levels, and Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease

Brunham, Liam R.·2008·JAMA

Abstract

would not expect a change in our results. Regarding the use of self-reported data on family history, prior studies have found self-reported information on family history of cancer in first-degree relatives to be valid. Underreporting tends to be the most common source of error in family history reports. This misclassification would tend to attenuate any association of family history of colorectal cancer on patient survival. Moreover, the prevalence of family history of colorectal cancer among study participants was consistent with other studies. We agree that people who are aware of a family history of colorectal cancer might adopt a more health-conscious lifestyle and may be more likely to be diagnosed at earlier stages. However, we did not observe any significant differences in T stage (invasion through the bowel wall), N stage (number of positive lymph nodes), tumor differentiation, performance status, or postoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen between patients with or without a family history. Furthermore, a significant association between a family history and disease-free survival persisted even after adjusting for predictors of cancer recurrence or death as well as in stratified analyses of patients according to T and N stage. Regarding preferential responsiveness to chemotherapy, all patients were randomized to standardized chemotherapy protocols, and there were no differences in survival according to treatment group. Because we did not assess family size or sex of the affected family member, we are unable to examine family history according to sex of the affected relative or personyears of exposure. However, we are unaware of data demonstrating that risk of developing colorectal cancer is influenced by the sex of an affected first-degree relative and have no reason to suspect that sex of the relative would influence survival. We did examine whether the effect of family history varied according to the age at which the firstdegree relative was diagnosed with colorectal cancer. As reported, we found no difference in the adjusted hazard ratio for disease-free survival among patients whose relative was diagnosed with colorectal cancer at an age younger than 50 years compared with 50 years or older.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2008.539

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brunham, L. R.
Corresponding author
Brunham, Liam R.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2008-11-05
Volume
300
Issue
17
Pages
1997
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2086090824
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Keywords
HDL cholesterol, ischemic heart disease, familial hypercholesterolemia, familial hypertriglyceridemia, genetic risk factors, cardiovascular risk
MeSH terms
Humans, Cholesterol, HDL, Mutation, Myocardial Ischemia, ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters, ATP Binding Cassette Transporter 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review