Cited by 85Electronic Health Records SystemsThoreau and American LiteratureMedical Coding and Health Information

Eight Rights of Safe Electronic Health Record Use

Sittig, Dean F.·2009·JAMA

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2009.1311

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 9 · Cited by 85

Authors
Sittig, D. F.
Affiliations
Memorial Hermann (US)
Corresponding author
Sittig, Dean F.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2009-09-09
Volume
302
Issue
10
Pages
1111
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W1976888039
Cited by
85
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 7
FWCI
21.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • National Cancer Institute (K23CA125585)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (R01LM006942)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Thoreau and American Literature
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
Keywords
electronic health records, patient rights, health information privacy, patient safety, health information technology
MeSH terms
Communication, Computers, Confidentiality, Financing, Government, Health Personnel, Humans, Medical Informatics, Policy Making, Software, United States, User-Computer Interface, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Models, Organizational, Privacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review