The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diagnostic Errors—The Next Frontier for Patient Safety
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A New, Evidence-based Estimate of Patient Harms Associated with Hospital Care
James, J. T. (2013) · Journal of Patient Safety · doi:10.1097/pts.0b013e3182948a69 · Cited by 1,399
Teamwork in healthcare: Key discoveries enabling safer, high-quality care.
Rosen, M. A., DiazGranados, D., Dietz, A. S., Benishek, L. E., Thompson, D., Pronovost, P. J., & Weaver, S. J. (2018) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000298 · Cited by 1,283
Diagnostic Error in Medicine: Analysis of 583 Physician-Reported Errors
Schiff, G. D. (2009) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.333 · Cited by 638
Computerized Virtual Patients in Health Professions Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Cook, D. A., Erwin, P. J., & Triola, M. M. (2010) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e3181edfe13 · Cited by 570
Cognitive and System Factors Contributing to Diagnostic Errors in Radiology
Lee, C. S., Nagy, P. G., Weaver, S. J., & Newman-Toker, D. E. (2013) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.12.10375 · Cited by 415
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Newman-Toker, D. E.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2009-03-11
- Volume
- 301
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1060
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2140657380
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnostic Errors—The Next Frontier for Patient Safety. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2009.249
- The paper
- Newman-Toker, D. E. (2009). Diagnostic Errors—The Next Frontier for Patient Safety. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.249
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
