Safe Electronic Health Record Use Requires a Comprehensive Monitoring and Evaluation Framework
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sittig and Classen endorse the reporting of computer-related incidents as an essential component of their framework for safe use of IT systems.
“Sittig and Classen 21 endorse the reporting of computer-related incidents as an essential component of their framework for safe use of IT systems.”
From An analysis of computer-related patient safety incidents to inform the development of a classification (2010) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 9 · Cited by 76
- Authors
- Sittig, D. F.
- Affiliations
- Memorial Hermann (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sittig, Dean F.
- ORCID
- Sittig, Dean F.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2010-02-03
- Volume
- 303
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 450
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- PMC
- PMC2965782
- OpenAlex
- W2030246418
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 26.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. National Library of Medicine (R01LM006942, R56LM006942)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Keywords
- electronic health records, patient safety, monitoring and evaluation, health information technology, adverse events
- MeSH terms
- Accreditation, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Safety, United States, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, Electronic Health Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
