The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Infection Rate and Acute Organ Dysfunction Risk as Explanations for Racial Differences in Severe Sepsis
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: Severe sepsis, defined as infection complicated by acute organ dysfunction, occurs more frequently and leads to more deaths in black than in white individuals. The optimal approach to minimize these disparities is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent to which higher severe sepsis rates in black than in white patients are due to higher infection rates or to a higher risk of acute organ dysfunction. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Analysis of infection-related hospitalizations from the 2005 hospital discharge data of 7 US states and infection-related emergency department visits from the 2003-2007 National Hospital Ambulatory Care Survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Age- and sex-standardized severe sepsis and infection hospitalization rates and the risk of acute organ dysfunction. RESULTS: Of 8,661,227 non-childbirth-related discharges, 2,261,857 were associated with an infection, and of these, 381,787 (16.8%) had severe sepsis. Black patients had a 67% higher age- and sex-standardized severe sepsis rate than did white patients (9.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.3-9.5 vs 5.6; 95% CI, 5.6-5.6 per 1000 population; P < .001) and 80% higher standardized mortality (1.8, 95% CI, 1.8-1.9 vs 1.0, 95% CI, 1.0-1.1 per 1000 population; P < .001). The higher severe sepsis rate was explained by both a higher infection rate in black patients (47.3; 95% CI, 47.1-47.4 vs 34.0; 95% CI, 33.9-34.0 per 1000 population; incidence rate ratio, 1.39; P < .001) and a higher risk of developing acute organ dysfunction (age- and sex-adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.27-1.30; P < .001). Differences in infection presented broadly across different sites and etiology of infection and for community- and hospital-acquired infections and occurred despite a lower likelihood of being admitted for infection from the emergency department (adjusted OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.64-0.76; P < .001). The higher risk of organ dysfunction persisted but was attenuated after adjusting for age, sex, comorbid conditions, poverty, and hospital effect (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.13-1.16; P < .001). Racial disparities in infection and severe sepsis incidence and mortality rates were largest among younger adults (eg, the proportion of invasive pneumococcal disease occurring in adults < 65 years was 73.9% among black patients vs 44.5% among white patients, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Racial differences in severe sepsis are explained by both a higher infection rate and a higher risk of acute organ dysfunction in black than in white individuals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases
DEYO, R. (1992) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8 · Cited by 10,452
The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000
Martin, G. S., Mannino, D. M., Eaton, S., & Moss, M. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa022139 · Cited by 5,841
Contribution of major diseases to disparities in mortality.
Wong, M. D., Shapiro, M. F., Boscardin, W. J., & Ettner, S. L. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa012979 · Cited by 774
Racial Variation in the Incidence, Care, and Outcomes of Severe Sepsis
Barnato, A. E., Alexander, S. L., Linde-Zwirble, W. T., & Angus, D. C. (2008) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200703-480oc · Cited by 284
Cited by
Iwashyna, T. J., Odden, A., Rohde, J., Bonham, C., Kuhn, L., Malani, P., Chen, L., & Flanders, S. (2014) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e318268ac86 · Cited by 358
Lipocalin-2 protects the brain during inflammatory conditions
Kang, S. S., Ren, Y., Liu, C.-C., Kurti, A., Baker, K. E., Bu, G., Asmann, Y., & Fryer, J. D. (2018) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2016.243 · Cited by 162
Kahn, J. M., Davis, B. S., Yabes, J. G., Chang, C.-C. H., Chong, D. H., Hershey, T. B., Martsolf, G. R., & Angus, D. C. (2019) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2019.9021 · Cited by 149
Chronic Medical Conditions and Risk of Sepsis
Wang, H. E., Shapiro, N. I., Griffin, R., Safford, M. M., Judd, S., & Howard, G. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048307 · Cited by 142
Goodwin (2016) · doi:10.1016/j.chest.2016.07.004 · Cited by 86
The effect of community socioeconomic status on sepsis-attributable mortality
Galiatsatos, P., Brigham, E. P., Pietri, J., Littleton, K., Hwang, S., Grant, M. C., Hansel, N. N., & Chen, E. S. (2018) · Journal of Critical Care · doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.01.008 · Cited by 48
Banta, J. E., Joshi, K. P., Beeson, L., & Nguyen, H. B. (2012) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e31825bc92f · Cited by 45
Ogundipe, F., Kodadhala, V., Ogundipe, T., Mehari, A., & Gillum, R. (2019) · Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities · doi:10.1007/s40615-018-00553-w · Cited by 26
Mohammed, S., Matos, J., Doutreligne, M., Celi, L. A., & Struja, T. (2023) · The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine · doi:10.59249/wdji8829 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Mayr, F. B.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2010-06-23
- Volume
- 303
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 2495
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2075724672
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.