The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Endoscopic Transgastric vs Surgical Necrosectomy for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Randomized Trial
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: Most patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis require necrosectomy. Surgical necrosectomy induces a proinflammatory response and is associated with a high complication rate. Endoscopic transgastric necrosectomy, a form of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, may reduce the proinflammatory response and reduce complications. OBJECTIVE: To compare the proinflammatory response and clinical outcome of endoscopic transgastric and surgical necrosectomy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Randomized controlled assessor-blinded clinical trial in 3 academic hospitals and 1 regional teaching hospital in The Netherlands between August 20, 2008, and March 3, 2010. Patients had signs of infected necrotizing pancreatitis and an indication for intervention. INTERVENTIONS: Random allocation to endoscopic transgastric or surgical necrosectomy. Endoscopic necrosectomy consisted of transgastric puncture, balloon dilatation, retroperitoneal drainage, and necrosectomy. Surgical necrosectomy consisted of video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement or, if not feasible, laparotomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was the postprocedural proinflammatory response as measured by serum interleukin 6 (IL-6) levels. Secondary clinical end points included a predefined composite end point of major complications (new-onset multiple organ failure, intra-abdominal bleeding, enterocutaneous fistula, or pancreatic fistula) or death. RESULTS: We randomized 22 patients, 2 of whom did not undergo necrosectomy following percutaneous catheter drainage and could not be analyzed for the primary end point. Endoscopic transgastric necrosectomy reduced the postprocedural IL-6 levels compared with surgical necrosectomy (P = .004). The composite clinical end point occurred less often after endoscopic necrosectomy (20% vs 80%; risk difference [RD], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.16-0.80; P = .03). Endoscopic necrosectomy did not cause new-onset multiple organ failure (0% vs 50%, RD, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.12-0.76; P = .03) and reduced the number of pancreatic fistulas (10% vs 70%; RD, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.17-0.81; P = .02). CONCLUSION: In patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis, endoscopic necrosectomy reduced the proinflammatory response as well as the composite clinical end point compared with surgical necrosectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN07091918.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bone, R. C. (1996) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-125-8-199610150-00009 · Cited by 718
Pradhan, A. D., Everett, B. M., Cook, N. R., Rifai, N., & Ridker, P. M. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1347 · Cited by 117
Cited by
American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis
Tenner, S., Baillie, J., DeWitt, J., & Vege, S. S. (2013) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2013.218 · Cited by 2,327
Arvanitakis, M., Dumonceau, J.-M., Albert, J., Badaoui, A., Bali, M., Barthet, M., Besselink, M., Deviere, J., Oliveira Ferreira, A., Gyökeres, T., et al. (2018) · Endoscopy · doi:10.1055/a-0588-5365 · Cited by 538
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bakker, O. J., van Santvoort, H. C., van Brunschot, S., Geskus, R. B., Besselink, M. G., Bollen, T. L., van Eijck, C. H., Fockens, P., Hazebroek, E. J., Nijmeijer, R. M., Poley, J.-W., van Ramshorst, B., Vleggaar, F. P., Boermeester, M. A., Gooszen, H. G., Weusten, B. L., Timmer, R., & Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group, F. T.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2012-03-14
- Volume
- 307
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1053
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2048835849
- Cited by
- 742
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 57.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endoscopic Transgastric vs Surgical Necrosectomy for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Randomized Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2012.276
- The paper
- Bakker, O. J., van Santvoort, H. C., van Brunschot, S., Geskus, R. B., Besselink, M. G., Bollen, T. L., van Eijck, C. H., Fockens, P., Hazebroek, E. J., Nijmeijer, R. M., Poley, J.-W., van Ramshorst, B., Vleggaar, F. P., Boermeester, M. A., Gooszen, H. G., Weusten, B. L., Timmer, R., & Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group, F. T. (2012). Endoscopic Transgastric vs Surgical Necrosectomy for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Randomized Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.276
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.