Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 742

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Endoscopic Transgastric vs Surgical Necrosectomy for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Randomized Trial

Open access
Bakker, Olaf J., van Santvoort, Hjalmar C., van Brunschot, Sandra, Geskus, Ronald B., Besselink, Marc G., Bollen, Thomas L., van Eijck, Casper H., Fockens, Paul, Hazebroek, Eric J., Nijmeijer, Rian M., Poley, Jan-Werner, van Ramshorst, Bert, Vleggaar, Frank P., Boermeester, Marja A., Gooszen, Hein G., Weusten, Bas L., Timmer, Robin, Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group, for the·2012·JAMA

Abstract

CONTEXT: Most patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis require necrosectomy. Surgical necrosectomy induces a proinflammatory response and is associated with a high complication rate. Endoscopic transgastric necrosectomy, a form of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, may reduce the proinflammatory response and reduce complications. OBJECTIVE: To compare the proinflammatory response and clinical outcome of endoscopic transgastric and surgical necrosectomy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Randomized controlled assessor-blinded clinical trial in 3 academic hospitals and 1 regional teaching hospital in The Netherlands between August 20, 2008, and March 3, 2010. Patients had signs of infected necrotizing pancreatitis and an indication for intervention. INTERVENTIONS: Random allocation to endoscopic transgastric or surgical necrosectomy. Endoscopic necrosectomy consisted of transgastric puncture, balloon dilatation, retroperitoneal drainage, and necrosectomy. Surgical necrosectomy consisted of video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement or, if not feasible, laparotomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was the postprocedural proinflammatory response as measured by serum interleukin 6 (IL-6) levels. Secondary clinical end points included a predefined composite end point of major complications (new-onset multiple organ failure, intra-abdominal bleeding, enterocutaneous fistula, or pancreatic fistula) or death. RESULTS: We randomized 22 patients, 2 of whom did not undergo necrosectomy following percutaneous catheter drainage and could not be analyzed for the primary end point. Endoscopic transgastric necrosectomy reduced the postprocedural IL-6 levels compared with surgical necrosectomy (P = .004). The composite clinical end point occurred less often after endoscopic necrosectomy (20% vs 80%; risk difference [RD], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.16-0.80; P = .03). Endoscopic necrosectomy did not cause new-onset multiple organ failure (0% vs 50%, RD, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.12-0.76; P = .03) and reduced the number of pancreatic fistulas (10% vs 70%; RD, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.17-0.81; P = .02). CONCLUSION: In patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis, endoscopic necrosectomy reduced the proinflammatory response as well as the composite clinical end point compared with surgical necrosectomy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN07091918.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2012.276

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 742

Metadata

Authors
Bakker, O. J., van Santvoort, H. C., van Brunschot, S., Geskus, R. B., Besselink, M. G., Bollen, T. L., van Eijck, C. H., Fockens, P., Hazebroek, E. J., Nijmeijer, R. M., Poley, J.-W., van Ramshorst, B., Vleggaar, F. P., Boermeester, M. A., Gooszen, H. G., Weusten, B. L., Timmer, R., & Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group, F. T.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2012-03-14
Volume
307
Issue
10
Pages
1053
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2048835849
Cited by
742
References
2
FWCI
57.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endoscopic Transgastric vs Surgical Necrosectomy for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Randomized Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2012.276
The paper
Bakker, O. J., van Santvoort, H. C., van Brunschot, S., Geskus, R. B., Besselink, M. G., Bollen, T. L., van Eijck, C. H., Fockens, P., Hazebroek, E. J., Nijmeijer, R. M., Poley, J.-W., van Ramshorst, B., Vleggaar, F. P., Boermeester, M. A., Gooszen, H. G., Weusten, B. L., Timmer, R., & Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group, F. T. (2012). Endoscopic Transgastric vs Surgical Necrosectomy for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis: A Randomized Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.276

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.