The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Induction Therapy With Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Living-Related Kidney Transplants: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
CONTEXT: Antibody-based induction therapy plus calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) reduce acute rejection rates in kidney recipients; however, opportunistic infections and toxic CNI effects remain challenging. Reportedly, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have successfully treated graft-vs-host disease. OBJECTIVE: To assess autologous MSCs as replacement of antibody induction for patients with end-stage renal disease who undergo ABO-compatible, cross-match-negative kidney transplants from a living-related donor. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: One hundred fifty-nine patients were enrolled in this single-site, prospective, open-label, randomized study from February 2008-May 2009, when recruitment was completed. INTERVENTION: Patients were inoculated with marrow-derived autologous MSC (1-2 x 10(6)/kg) at kidney reperfusion and two weeks later. Fifty-three patients received standard-dose and 52 patients received low-dose CNIs (80% of standard); 51 patients in the control group received anti-IL-2 receptor antibody plus standard-dose CNIs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary measure was 1-year incidence of acute rejection and renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR]); the secondary measure was patient and graft survival and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Patient and graft survival at 13 to 30 months was similar in all groups. After 6 months, 4 of 53 patients (7.5%) in the autologous MSC plus standard-dose CNI group (95% CI, 0.4%-14.7%; P = .04) and 4 of 52 patients (7.7%) in the low-dose group (95% CI, 0.5%-14.9%; P = .046) compared with 11 of 51 controls (21.6%; 95% CI, 10.5%-32.6%) had biopsy-confirmed acute rejection. None of the patients in either autologous MSC group had glucorticoid-resistant rejection, whereas 4 patients (7.8%) in the control group did (95% CI, 0.6%-15.1%; overall P = .02). Renal function recovered faster among both MSC groups showing increased eGFR levels during the first month after surgery than the control group. Patients receiving standard-dose CNI had a mean difference of 6.2 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) (95% CI, 0.4-11.9; P=.04) and those in the low-dose CNI of 10.0 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) (95% CI, 3.8-16.2; P=.002). Also, during the 1-year follow-up, combined analysis of MSC-treated groups revealed significantly decreased risk of opportunistic infections than the control group (hazard ratio, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.20-0.85, P=.02) CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing renal transplant, the use of autologous MSCs compared with anti-IL-2 receptor antibody induction therapy resulted in lower incidence of acute rejection, decreased risk of opportunistic infection, and better estimated renal function at 1 year. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00658073.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dominici, M., Le Blanc, K., Mueller, I., Slaper-Cortenbach, I., Marini, F. C., Krause, D. S., Deans, R. J., Keating, A., Prockop, D. J., & Horwitz, E. M. (2006) · Cytotherapy · doi:10.1080/14653240600855905 · Cited by 17,766
Duijvestein, M., Vos, A. C. W., Roelofs, H., Wildenberg, M. E., Wendrich, B. B., Verspaget, H. W., Kooy-Winkelaar, E. M. C., Koning, F., Zwaginga, J. J., Fidder, H. H., et al. (2010) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2010.215152 · Cited by 622
J. Centeno, C., R. Schultz, J., Cheever, M., Freeman, M., Faulkner, S., Robinson, B., & Hanson, R. (2011) · Current Stem Cell Research & Therapy · doi:10.2174/157488811797904371 · Cited by 234
Cited by
Immunoregulatory mechanisms of mesenchymal stem and stromal cells in inflammatory diseases
Shi, Y., Wang, Y., Li, Q., Liu, K., Hou, J., Shao, C., & Wang, Y. (2018) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-018-0023-5 · Cited by 1,223
Mesenchymal stem cells and immunomodulation: current status and future prospects
Gao, F., Chiu, S. M., Motan, D. A. L., Zhang, Z., Chen, L., Ji, H.-L., Tse, H.-F., Fu, Q.-L., & Lian, Q. (2016) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/cddis.2015.327 · Cited by 1,121
Eggenhofer, E., Benseler, V., Kroemer, A., Popp, F. C., Geissler, E. K., Schlitt, H. J., Baan, C. C., Dahlke, M. H., & Hoogduijn, M. J. (2012) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2012.00297 · Cited by 804
Mesenchymal stromal cells: new directions
Keating, A. (2012) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2012.05.015 · Cited by 778
Biological functions of mesenchymal stem cells and clinical implications
Naji, A., Eitoku, M., Favier, B., Deschaseaux, F., Rouas-Freiss, N., & Suganuma, N. (2019) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-019-03125-1 · Cited by 624
Metadata
- Authors
- Tan, J., Wu, W., Xu, X., Liao, L., Zheng, F., Messinger, S., Sun, X., Chen, J., Yang, S., Cai, J., Gao, X., Pileggi, A., & Ricordi, C.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2012-03-21
- Volume
- 307
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1169
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2060437379
- Cited by
- 553
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 46.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Induction Therapy With Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Living-Related Kidney Transplants: A Randomized Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2012.316
- The paper
- Tan, J., Wu, W., Xu, X., Liao, L., Zheng, F., Messinger, S., Sun, X., Chen, J., Yang, S., Cai, J., Gao, X., Pileggi, A., & Ricordi, C. (2012). Induction Therapy With Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Living-Related Kidney Transplants: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.316
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.