Prognostic Models for Older Adults
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Any given individual's risk is model-dependent; each different way of defining similarity leads to a different risk estimate-and often a very different risk estimate-for a given individual.
“any given individual’s “risk” is model-dependent. Each different way of defining similarity leads to a different risk estimate–and often a very different risk estimate–for a given individual10,11.”
From Predictably unequal: understanding and addressing concerns that algorithmic clinical prediction may increase health disparities (2020) · cites this paper as [10]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 4 · Cited by 3
- Authors
- Kent, D. M.
- Corresponding author
- Kent, David M.
- ORCID
- Kent, David M.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2012-05-09
- Volume
- 307
- Issue
- 18
- Pages
- 1911
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W1992396994
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Keywords
- prognostic model, older adults, geriatrics, prediction of outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Decision Making, Humans, Life Expectancy, Mortality, Prognosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
