The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Cognitive-Behavioral Couple Therapy for PTSD: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a prevalent condition associated with intimate relationship problems, and intimate relationship factors have been shown to affect individual PTSD treatment outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To compare cognitive-behavioral conjoint therapy for PTSD (a manualized couple therapy delivered to patients with PTSD and their significant others to simultaneously treat PTSD symptoms and enhance relationship satisfaction) with a wait-list condition. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomized controlled trial of heterosexual and same-sex couples (n = 40 couples; n = 80 individuals) in which one partner met criteria for PTSD according to the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale, conducted from 2008 to 2012 in a Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient hospital setting in Boston, Massachusetts, and a university-based research center in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Symptoms of PTSD, comorbid conditions, and relationship satisfaction were collected by blinded assessors at baseline, at mid treatment (median, 8.00 weeks [range, 1.71-20.43 weeks] after baseline), and at posttreatment (median, 15.86 weeks [range, 7.14-38.57 weeks] after baseline). An uncontrolled 3-month follow-up (median, 38.21 weeks [range, 28.43-50.57 weeks] after baseline) was also completed. INTERVENTION: Couples were randomly assigned to take part in the 15-session cognitive-behavioral conjoint therapy for PTSD protocol immediately (n = 20) or were placed on a wait list for the therapy (n = 20). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinician-rated PTSD symptom severity was the primary outcome and was assessed with the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale. Intimate relationship satisfaction, assessed with the Dyadic Adjustment Scale, patient- and partner-rated PTSD symptoms, and comorbid symptoms were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: PTSD symptom severity (score range, 0-136) was significantly more improved in the couple therapy condition than in the wait-list condition (mean change difference, -23.21; 95% CI, -37.87 to -8.55). Similarly, patients' intimate relationship satisfaction (score range, 0-151) was significantly more improved in couple therapy than in the wait-list condition (mean change difference, 9.43; 95% CI, 0.04-18.83). The time × condition interaction effect in the multilevel model predicting PTSD symptoms (t37.5 = -3.09; P = .004) and patient-reported relationship satisfaction (t68.5 = 2.00; P = .049) revealed superiority of the couple therapy compared with the wait list. Treatment effects were maintained at 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Among couples in which one partner was diagnosed as having PTSD, a disorder-specific couple therapy, compared with a wait list for the therapy, resulted in decreased PTSD symptom severity and patient comorbid symptom severity and increased patient relationship satisfaction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00669981.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In that study, the effects for clinician-rated PTSD from pre- to post-treatment were g = 1.82, and g = .64 for patient-rated and g = .15 for partner-rated relationship adjustment.”
From MDMA-facilitated cognitive-behavioural conjoint therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder: an uncontrolled trial (2020) · cites this paper as Monson et al., 2012
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In addition, the effects on PTSD, other symptoms, and relationship outcomes in this study were on par with, or greater than, those previously achieved with CBCT alone.”
From MDMA-facilitated cognitive-behavioural conjoint therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder: an uncontrolled trial (2020) · cites this paper as Monson et al., 2012
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“CBCT for PTSD (Monson & Fredman, 2012) has been tested in community and military/veteran samples in uncontrolled and controlled trials.”
From MDMA-facilitated cognitive-behavioural conjoint therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder: an uncontrolled trial (2020) · cites this paper as Monson & Fredman, 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193146 · Cited by 65,971
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.59.1.12 · Cited by 7,770
Measuring Dyadic Adjustment: New Scales for Assessing the Quality of Marriage and Similar Dyads
Spanier, G. B. (1976) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/350547 · Cited by 7,095
The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and Preliminary Psychometric Data
STRAUS, M. A., HAMBY, S. L., BONEY-McCOY, S., & SUGARMAN, D. B. (1996) · Journal of Family Issues · doi:10.1177/019251396017003001 · Cited by 6,923
The development of a Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale
Blake, D. D., Weathers, F. W., Nagy, L. M., Kaloupek, D. G., Gusman, F. D., Charney, D. S., & Keane, T. M. (1995) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1002/jts.2490080106 · Cited by 5,024
Marriage and health: His and hers
Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Newton, T. L. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.127.4.472 · Cited by 2,460
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- [16]First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JB Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Patient Edition (SCID-I/P) New York Biometrics Research Dept, New York State Psychiatric Institute 2002
- [18]Weathers FW Litz BT Herman JA Huska JA Keane TM The PTSD Checklist: reliability, validity and diagnostic utility Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (ISTSS) San Antonio, TX ISTSS 1993
- [26]Hedges LV Olkin I Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis London, England Academic Press 1985
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–301 of 301
Couple’s conflict among veterans seeking PTSD treatment
Barden, E. P., Zegel, M., Dunham, J., Nomamiukor, F. O., & Thompson‐Hollands, J. (2026) · Military Psychology · doi:10.1080/08995605.2026.2664931
Metadata
- Authors
- Monson, C. M., Fredman, S. J., Macdonald, A., Pukay-Martin, N. D., Resick, P. A., & Schnurr, P. P.
- Affiliations
- Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
- Boston University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Monson, Candice M.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2012-08-15
- Volume
- 308
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 700
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- PMC
- PMC4404628
- OpenAlex
- W1976692440
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 25.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- JAMA
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R34MH076813)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- post-traumatic stress disorder, couple therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, conjoint therapy, relationship satisfaction, PTSD comorbidity, veterans, same-sex couples, PTSD symptom severity, partner involvement in treatment, Dyadic Adjustment Scale, Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale, waitlist control, treatment outcome follow-up
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Severity of Illness Index, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Waiting Lists, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Couples Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review