Cited by 812Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentImmune Response and InflammationInflammation biomarkers and pathways

Effect of Eritoran, an Antagonist of MD2-TLR4, on Mortality in Patients With Severe Sepsis: The ACCESS Randomized Trial

Open access
Opal, Steven M., Laterre, Pierre-Francois, Francois, Bruno, LaRosa, Steven P., Angus, Derek C., Mira, Jean-Paul, Wittebole, Xavier, Dugernier, Thierry +22 more·2013·JAMA

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Eritoran is a synthetic lipid A antagonist that blocks lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from binding at the cell surface MD2-TLR4 receptor. LPS is a major component of the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria and is a potent activator of the acute inflammatory response. OBJECTIVE: To determine if eritoran, a TLR4 antagonist, would significantly reduce sepsis-induced mortality. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational phase 3 trial in 197 intensive care units. Patients were enrolled from June 2006 to September 2010 and final follow-up was completed in September 2011. INTERVENTIONS: Patients with severe sepsis (n = 1961) were randomized and treated within 12 hours of onset of first organ dysfunction in a 2:1 ratio with a 6-day course of either eritoran tetrasodium (105 mg total) or placebo, with n = 1304 and n = 657 patients, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was 28-day all-cause mortality. The secondary end points were all-cause mortality at 3, 6, and 12 months after beginning treatment. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of the 2 study groups were similar. In the modified intent-to-treat analysis (randomized patients who received at least 1 dose) there was no significant difference in the primary end point of 28-day all-cause mortality with 28.1% (366/1304) in the eritoran group vs 26.9% (177/657) in the placebo group (P = .59; hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.88-1.26; difference in mortality rate, -1.1; 95% CI, -5.3 to 3.1) or in the key secondary end point of 1-year all-cause mortality with 44.1% (290/657) in the eritoran group vs 43.3% (565/1304) in the placebo group, Kaplan-Meier analysis of time to death by 1 year, P = .79 (hazard ratio, 0.98; 0.85-1.13). No significant differences were observed in any of the prespecified subgroups. Adverse events, including secondary infection rates, did not differ between study groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with severe sepsis, the use of eritoran, compared with placebo, did not result in reduced 28-day mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00334828.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2013.2194

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Eritoran and resatorvid improved survival in animal sepsis models but did not reduce mortality in patients with severe sepsis.

    “Eritoran130 and resatorvid131 improved survival in animal models of sepsis, but did not reduce mortality in patients with severe sepsis132,133.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 812

Authors
Opal, S. M., Laterre, P.-F., Francois, B., LaRosa, S. P., Angus, D. C., Mira, J.-P., Wittebole, X., Dugernier, T., Perrotin, D., Tidswell, M., Jauregui, L., Krell, K., Pachl, J., Takahashi, T., Peckelsen, C., Cordasco, E., Chang, C.-S., Oeyen, S., Aikawa, N., Maruyama, T., Schein, R., Kalil, A. C., Van Nuffelen, M., Lynn, M., Rossignol, D. P., Gogate, J., Roberts, M. B., Wheeler, J. L., Vincent, J.-L., & ACCESS Study Group, F. T.
Affiliations
  • Brown University (US)
  • Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Université de Tours (FR)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Charles University (CZ)
  • China Medical University (TW)
  • Keio University (JP)
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
Corresponding author
Opal, Steven M.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2013-03-20
Volume
309
Issue
11
Pages
1154
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2060122053
Cited by
812
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 74 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 41
FWCI
59.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Inflammation biomarkers and pathways
Keywords
eritoran, severe sepsis, sepsis mortality, lipopolysaccharide, endotoxin, sepsis-induced organ dysfunction, intensive care unit patients, 28-day mortality, one-year mortality, sepsis treatment, acute inflammatory response, Gram-negative bacteria
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Disaccharides, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Sugar Phosphates, Sepsis, Toll-Like Receptor 4, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Young Adult, Organ Dysfunction Scores

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review