Effect of Self-monitoring and Medication Self-titration on Systolic Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients at High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: The TASMIN-SR Randomized Clinical Trial
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: Self-monitoring of blood pressure with self-titration of antihypertensives (self-management) results in lower blood pressure in patients with hypertension, but there are no data about patients in high-risk groups. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of self-monitoring with self-titration of antihypertensive medication compared with usual care on systolic blood pressure among patients with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, or chronic kidney disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A primary care, unblinded, randomized clinical trial involving 552 patients who were aged at least 35 years with a history of stroke, coronary heart disease, diabetes, or chronic kidney disease and with baseline blood pressure of at least 130/80 mm Hg being treated at 59 UK primary care practices was conducted between March 2011 and January 2013. INTERVENTIONS: Self-monitoring of blood pressure combined with an individualized self-titration algorithm. During the study period, the office visit blood pressure measurement target was 130/80 mm Hg and the home measurement target was 120/75 mm Hg. Control patients received usual care consisting of seeing their health care clinician for routine blood pressure measurement and adjustment of medication if necessary. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the difference in systolic blood pressure between intervention and control groups at the 12-month office visit. RESULTS: Primary outcome data were available from 450 patients (81%). The mean baseline blood pressure was 143.1/80.5 mm Hg in the intervention group and 143.6/79.5 mm Hg in the control group. After 12 months, the mean blood pressure had decreased to 128.2/73.8 mm Hg in the intervention group and to 137.8/76.3 mm Hg in the control group, a difference of 9.2 mm Hg (95% CI, 5.7-12.7) in systolic and 3.4 mm Hg (95% CI, 1.8-5.0) in diastolic blood pressure following correction for baseline blood pressure. Multiple imputation for missing values gave similar results: the mean baseline was 143.5/80.2 mm Hg in the intervention group vs 144.2/79.9 mm Hg in the control group, and at 12 months, the mean was 128.6/73.6 mm Hg in the intervention group vs 138.2/76.4 mm Hg in the control group, with a difference of 8.8 mm Hg (95% CI, 4.9-12.7) for systolic and 3.1 mm Hg (95% CI, 0.7-5.5) for diastolic blood pressure between groups. These results were comparable in all subgroups, without excessive adverse events. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with hypertension at high risk of cardiovascular disease, self-monitoring with self-titration of antihypertensive medication compared with usual care resulted in lower systolic blood pressure at 12 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN87171227.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Patients can use home blood pressure to titrate their own antihypertensive medication successfully.
“patients can also use HBP to titrate their own antihypertensive medication successfully”
Self-titration of antihypertensive medication using home blood pressure translates into improved blood pressure control rates.
“which translates into improved BP control rates [54,55].”
Self-titration of antihypertensive medication using home blood pressure translates into improved blood pressure control rates.
“which translates into improved BP control rates [54,55].”
Patients can use home blood pressure to titrate their own antihypertensive medication successfully.
“patients can also use HBP to titrate their own antihypertensive medication successfully”
In TASMIN-SR, after 12 months, mean BP decreased to 128.2/73.8 mmHg in the intervention group and to 137.8/76.3 mmHg in the control group, with a difference of 9.2/3.4 mmHg after correction for baseline BP.
“The intervention was compared with usual care in higher risk patients with hypertension and after 12 months, the mean BP had decreased to 128.2/73.8 mmHg in the intervention group and to 137.8/76.3 mmHg in the control group, with a difference of 9.2/3.4 mmHg after correction for baseline BP”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 408
- Authors
- McManus, R. J., Mant, J., Haque, M. S., Bray, E. P., Bryan, S., Greenfield, S. M., Jones, M. I., Jowett, S., Little, P., Penaloza, C., Schwartz, C., Shackleford, H., Shovelton, C., Varghese, J., Williams, B., & Hobbs, F. D. R.
- Affiliations
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (GB)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Primary Care Clinical Sciences, NIHR School for Primary Care Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- University of Lancashire (GB)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- University of Southampton (GB)
- Health Economics Unit, School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- ORCID
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2014-08-27
- Volume
- 312
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 799
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2121607038
- Cited by
- 408
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 7
- FWCI
- 22.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CLOK (University of Central Lancashire) (acceptedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (CDF/01/017, NF-SI-0611-10273, NIHR-RP-02-12-015, WMCLAHRC-2014-1, PB-PG-1207-15042, RP-PG-1209-10051, RP-PG-0606-1153)
- Medical Research Council (MC_PC_13090)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
- Keywords
- hypertension, self-measured blood pressure, self-management, systolic blood pressure, cardiovascular risk, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, primary care, antihypertensive treatment intensification, home blood pressure monitoring, blood pressure targets, stroke, coronary artery disease, usual care comparison, medication adherence
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Algorithms, Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Risk, Self Administration, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Stroke, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review