The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The PCORI Perspective on Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Abstract
The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) was established as part of the US Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 to fund patient-centered comparative clinical effectiveness research, extending the concept of patient-centeredness from health care delivery to health care research. In the United States, patient-centered outcomes research is new and not defined in the legislation, and the rationale is unclear to many. In this Viewpoint, we address 2 related questions: What does patientcenteredness in research mean? Why conduct patientcentered outcomes research? The essence of the PCORI definition of patientcentered outcomes research is the evaluation of questions and outcomes meaningful and important to patients and caregivers. The definition rests on the axiom that patients have unique perspectives that can change and improve the pursuit of clinical questions. Relevant to both the definition and rationale is the hypothesis that including the perspectives of end users of the research, which include patients, physicians, and other health care stakeholders, will enhance the relevance of research to actual health decisions these end users face. In turn, increased relevance is hypothesized to improve uptake of the evidence and improve the likelihood that patients will achieve the health outcomes they desire. Although this proposed causal chain is readily understood in relation to questions of direct interest to pa
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Calvert, M., Kyte, D., Mercieca-Bebber, R., Slade, A., Chan, A.-W., King, M. T., and the SPIRIT-PRO Group, Hunn, A., Bottomley, A., Regnault, A., et al. (2018) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.21903 · Cited by 814
Self-citationAn introduction to effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs
Landes, S. J., McBain, S. A., & Curran, G. M. (2019) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112513 · Cited by 516
Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research: who's listening?
Moher, D., Glasziou, P., Chalmers, I., Nasser, M., Bossuyt, P. M. M., Korevaar, D. A., Graham, I. D., Ravaud, P., & Boutron, I. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00307-4 · Cited by 462
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Bariatric Procedures for Weight Loss: A PCORnet Cohort Study
Arterburn, D., Wellman, R., Emiliano, A., Smith, S. R., Odegaard, A. O., Murali, S., Williams, N., Coleman, K. J., Courcoulas, A., Coley, R. Y., et al. (2018) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m17-2786 · Cited by 317
Capitalizing on Advances in Science to Reduce the Health Consequences of Early Childhood Adversity
Shonkoff, J. P. (2016) · JAMA Pediatrics · doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.1559 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Frank, L., Basch, E., & Selby, J. V.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2014-10-15
- Volume
- 312
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 1513
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W1991660416
- Cited by
- 583
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 97.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The PCORI Perspective on Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2014.11100
- The paper
- Frank, L., Basch, E., & Selby, J. V. (2014). The PCORI Perspective on Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.11100
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.