Cited by 89Healthcare Policy and ManagementHealthcare cost, quality, practicesHealthcare Quality and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Total Expenditures per Patient in Hospital-Owned and Physician-Owned Physician Organizations in California

Open access
Robinson, James C., Miller, Kelly·2014·JAMA

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Hospitals are rapidly acquiring medical groups and physician practices. This consolidation may foster cooperation and thereby reduce expenditures, but also may lead to higher expenditures through greater use of hospital-based ambulatory services and through greater hospital pricing leverage against health insurers. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether total expenditures per patient were higher in physician organizations (integrated medical groups and independent practice associations) owned by local hospitals or multihospital systems compared with groups owned by participating physicians. DESIGN AND SETTING: Data were obtained on total expenditures for the care provided to 4.5 million patients treated by integrated medical groups and independent practice associations in California between 2009 and 2012. The patients were covered by commercial health maintenance organization (HMO) insurance and the data did not include patients covered by commercial preferred provider organization (PPO) insurance, Medicare, or Medicaid. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Total expenditures per patient annually, measured in terms of what insurers paid to the physician organizations for professional services, to hospitals for inpatient and outpatient procedures, to clinical laboratories for diagnostic tests, and to pharmaceutical manufacturers for drugs and biologics. EXPOSURES: Annual expenditures per patient were compared after adjusting for patient illness burden, geographic input costs, and organizational characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 158 organizations, 118 physician organizations (75%) were physician-owned and provided care for 3,065,551 patients, 19 organizations (12%) were owned by local hospitals and provided care for 728,608 patients, and 21 organizations (13%) were owned by multihospital systems and provided care for 693,254 patients. In 2012, physician-owned physician organizations had mean expenditures of $3066 per patient (95% CI, $2892 to $3240), hospital-owned physician organizations had mean expenditures of $4312 per patient (95% CI, $3768 to $4857), and physician organizations owned by multihospital systems had mean expenditures of $4776 (95% CI, $4349 to $5202) per patient. After adjusting for patient severity and other factors over the period, local hospital-owned physician organizations incurred expenditures per patient 10.3% (95% CI, 1.7% to 19.7%) higher than did physician-owned organizations (adjusted difference, $435 [95% CI, $105 to $766], P = .02). Organizations owned by multihospital systems incurred expenditures 19.8% (95% CI, 13.9% to 26.0%) higher (adjusted difference, $704 [95% CI,$512 to $895], P < .001) than physician-owned organizations. The largest physician organizations incurred expenditures per patient 9.2% (95% CI, 3.8% to 15.0%, P = .001) higher than the smallest organizations (adjusted difference, $130 [95% CI, $-32 to $292]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: From the perspective of the insurers and patients, between 2009 and 2012, hospital-owned physician organizations in California incurred higher expenditures for commercial HMO enrollees for professional, hospital, laboratory, pharmaceutical, and ancillary services than physician-owned organizations. Although organizational consolidation may increase some forms of care coordination, it may be associated with higher total expenditures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2014.14072

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Burns LR, Goldsmith JC, Sen A. Horizontal and vertical integration of physicians: a tale of 2 tails. Adv Health Care Manag. 2013;15:39-117.
  2. Fisher ES, McClellan MB, Bertko J, et al. Fostering accountable health care: moving forward in Medicare. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(2): w219-w231.
  3. Berenson RA, Ginsburg PB, Kemper N. Unchecked provider clout in California foreshadows challenges to health reform. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(4):699-705.
  4. Cutler DM, Scott Morton F. Hospitals, market share, and consolidation. JAMA. 2013;310(18): 1964-1970.
  5. Correia EW. Accountable care organizations: the proposed regulations and the prospects for success. Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(8):560-568.
  6. Robinson JC, Williams T, Yanagihara D. Measurement of and reward for efficiency in California's pay-for-performance program. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(5):1438-1447.
  7. Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S. How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates. Q J Econ. 2004;119(1):249-275. doi:10.1162/003355304772839588. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Gaynor M, Town R. Competition in health markets. In: Barros P, McGuire T, Pauly M, eds. Handbook of Health Economics. Vol 2. Waltham, MA: Elsevier; 2011:499-627.
  9. Baker LC, Bundorf MK, Kessler DP. Vertical integration: hospital ownership of physician practices is associated with higher prices and spending. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33(5):756-763.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 89

Metadata

Authors
Robinson, J. C., & Miller, K.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Integrated Healthcare Association, Oakland, California
Corresponding author
Robinson, James C.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2014-10-22
Volume
312
Issue
16
Pages
1663
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2163668474
Cited by
89
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 1
FWCI
28.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Quality and Management
Keywords
hospital consolidation, multihospital systems, independent practice associations, health care costs, California, hospital-physician integration
MeSH terms
California, Economics, Hospital, Health Expenditures, Group Practice, Health Maintenance Organizations, Humans, Independent Practice Associations, Insurance, Health, Reimbursement, Ownership, Physicians, Severity of Illness Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Total Expenditures per Patient in Hospital-Owned and Physician-Owned Physician Organizations in California. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2014.14072
The paper
Robinson, J. C., & Miller, K. (2014). Total Expenditures per Patient in Hospital-Owned and Physician-Owned Physician Organizations in California. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.14072