The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Total Expenditures per Patient in Hospital-Owned and Physician-Owned Physician Organizations in California
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: Hospitals are rapidly acquiring medical groups and physician practices. This consolidation may foster cooperation and thereby reduce expenditures, but also may lead to higher expenditures through greater use of hospital-based ambulatory services and through greater hospital pricing leverage against health insurers. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether total expenditures per patient were higher in physician organizations (integrated medical groups and independent practice associations) owned by local hospitals or multihospital systems compared with groups owned by participating physicians. DESIGN AND SETTING: Data were obtained on total expenditures for the care provided to 4.5 million patients treated by integrated medical groups and independent practice associations in California between 2009 and 2012. The patients were covered by commercial health maintenance organization (HMO) insurance and the data did not include patients covered by commercial preferred provider organization (PPO) insurance, Medicare, or Medicaid. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Total expenditures per patient annually, measured in terms of what insurers paid to the physician organizations for professional services, to hospitals for inpatient and outpatient procedures, to clinical laboratories for diagnostic tests, and to pharmaceutical manufacturers for drugs and biologics. EXPOSURES: Annual expenditures per patient were compared after adjusting for patient illness burden, geographic input costs, and organizational characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 158 organizations, 118 physician organizations (75%) were physician-owned and provided care for 3,065,551 patients, 19 organizations (12%) were owned by local hospitals and provided care for 728,608 patients, and 21 organizations (13%) were owned by multihospital systems and provided care for 693,254 patients. In 2012, physician-owned physician organizations had mean expenditures of $3066 per patient (95% CI, $2892 to $3240), hospital-owned physician organizations had mean expenditures of $4312 per patient (95% CI, $3768 to $4857), and physician organizations owned by multihospital systems had mean expenditures of $4776 (95% CI, $4349 to $5202) per patient. After adjusting for patient severity and other factors over the period, local hospital-owned physician organizations incurred expenditures per patient 10.3% (95% CI, 1.7% to 19.7%) higher than did physician-owned organizations (adjusted difference, $435 [95% CI, $105 to $766], P = .02). Organizations owned by multihospital systems incurred expenditures 19.8% (95% CI, 13.9% to 26.0%) higher (adjusted difference, $704 [95% CI,$512 to $895], P < .001) than physician-owned organizations. The largest physician organizations incurred expenditures per patient 9.2% (95% CI, 3.8% to 15.0%, P = .001) higher than the smallest organizations (adjusted difference, $130 [95% CI, $-32 to $292]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: From the perspective of the insurers and patients, between 2009 and 2012, hospital-owned physician organizations in California incurred higher expenditures for commercial HMO enrollees for professional, hospital, laboratory, pharmaceutical, and ancillary services than physician-owned organizations. Although organizational consolidation may increase some forms of care coordination, it may be associated with higher total expenditures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“small, physician-owned practices, while providing a greater level of personalization and responsiveness to patient needs, have lower average cost per patient, 6”
From The Paradox of Size: How Small, Independent Practices Can Thrive in Value-Based Care (2016) · cites this paper as [6]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Burns LR, Goldsmith JC, Sen A. Horizontal and vertical integration of physicians: a tale of 2 tails. Adv Health Care Manag. 2013;15:39-117.
- Fisher ES, McClellan MB, Bertko J, et al. Fostering accountable health care: moving forward in Medicare. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(2): w219-w231.
- Berenson RA, Ginsburg PB, Kemper N. Unchecked provider clout in California foreshadows challenges to health reform. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(4):699-705.
- Cutler DM, Scott Morton F. Hospitals, market share, and consolidation. JAMA. 2013;310(18): 1964-1970.
- Correia EW. Accountable care organizations: the proposed regulations and the prospects for success. Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(8):560-568.
- Robinson JC, Williams T, Yanagihara D. Measurement of and reward for efficiency in California's pay-for-performance program. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28(5):1438-1447.
- Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S. How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates. Q J Econ. 2004;119(1):249-275. doi:10.1162/003355304772839588. · DOI · Paper page
- Gaynor M, Town R. Competition in health markets. In: Barros P, McGuire T, Pauly M, eds. Handbook of Health Economics. Vol 2. Waltham, MA: Elsevier; 2011:499-627.
- Baker LC, Bundorf MK, Kessler DP. Vertical integration: hospital ownership of physician practices is associated with higher prices and spending. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014;33(5):756-763.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Paradox of Size: How Small, Independent Practices Can Thrive in Value-Based Care
Mostashari, F. (2016) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.1899 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Robinson, J. C., & Miller, K.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Integrated Healthcare Association, Oakland, California
- Corresponding author
- Robinson, James C.
- ORCID
- Robinson, James C.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2014-10-22
- Volume
- 312
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 1663
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2163668474
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 28.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.escholarship.org
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Quality and Management
- Keywords
- hospital consolidation, multihospital systems, independent practice associations, health care costs, California, hospital-physician integration
- MeSH terms
- California, Economics, Hospital, Health Expenditures, Group Practice, Health Maintenance Organizations, Humans, Independent Practice Associations, Insurance, Health, Reimbursement, Ownership, Physicians, Severity of Illness Index
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Total Expenditures per Patient in Hospital-Owned and Physician-Owned Physician Organizations in California. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2014.14072
- The paper
- Robinson, J. C., & Miller, K. (2014). Total Expenditures per Patient in Hospital-Owned and Physician-Owned Physician Organizations in California. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.14072