Effect of Screening for Coronary Artery Disease Using CT Angiography on Mortality and Cardiac Events in High-Risk Patients With Diabetes: The FACTOR-64 Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Importance Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus, yet CAD often is asymptomatic prior to myocardial infarction (MI) and coronary death. Objective To assess whether routine screening for CAD by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes deemed to be at high cardiac risk followed by CCTA-directed therapy would reduce the risk of death and nonfatal coronary outcomes. Design, setting, and participants The FACTOR-64 study was a randomized clinical trial in which 900 patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes of at least 3 to 5 years' duration and without symptoms of CAD were recruited from 45 clinics and practices of a single health system (Intermountain Healthcare, Utah), enrolled at a single-site coordinating center, and randomly assigned to CAD screening with CCTA (n = 452) or to standard national guidelines-based optimal diabetes care (n = 448) (targets: glycated hemoglobin level 50 mg/dL [women] or >40 mg/dL [men], triglycerides level Main outcomes and measures The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization; the secondary outcome was ischemic major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of CAD death, nonfatal MI, or unstable angina). Results At a mean follow-up time of 4.0 (SD, 1.7) years, the primary outcome event rates were not significantly different between the CCTA and t…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Another randomized study showed that routine screening with coronary computed tomography angiography did not reduce the composite rate of all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, or unstable angina in asymptomatic people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.
“Another randomized study showed that routine screening with coronary computed tomography angiography did not reduce the composite rate of all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, or unstable angina in asymptomatic people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes (211).”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [211]
Another randomized study showed that routine screening with coronary computed tomography angiography did not reduce the composite rate of all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, or unstable angina in asymptomatic people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.
“Another randomized study showed that routine screening with coronary computed tomography angiography did not reduce the composite rate of all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, or unstable angina in asymptomatic people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes (200).”
From 10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [200]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 19 · Cited by 373
- Authors
- Muhlestein, J. B., Lappé, D. L., Lima, J. A. C., Rosen, B. D., May, H. T., Knight, S., Bluemke, D. A., Towner, S. R., Le, V., Bair, T. L., Vavere, A. L., & Anderson, J. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Utah (US)
- Intermountain Medical Center Heart Institute, Murray, Utah2University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City
- Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Intermountain Medical Center (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2014-12-03
- Volume
- 312
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 2234
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2067143635
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 6
- FWCI
- 38.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- JAMA (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, coronary CT angiography, cardiovascular screening, high cardiovascular risk, all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, LDL cholesterol targets, asymptomatic patients, cardiovascular risk stratification, coronary revascularization
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Angina, Unstable, Coronary Artery Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Risk, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Coronary Angiography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review