Cited by 373Cardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Effect of Screening for Coronary Artery Disease Using CT Angiography on Mortality and Cardiac Events in High-Risk Patients With Diabetes: The FACTOR-64 Randomized Clinical Trial

Muhlestein, Joseph B., Lappé, Donald L., Lima, Joao A. C., Rosen, Boaz D., May, Heidi T., Knight, Stacey, Bluemke, David A., Towner, Steven R. +4 more·2014·JAMA

Abstract

Importance Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a major cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes mellitus, yet CAD often is asymptomatic prior to myocardial infarction (MI) and coronary death. Objective To assess whether routine screening for CAD by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes deemed to be at high cardiac risk followed by CCTA-directed therapy would reduce the risk of death and nonfatal coronary outcomes. Design, setting, and participants The FACTOR-64 study was a randomized clinical trial in which 900 patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes of at least 3 to 5 years' duration and without symptoms of CAD were recruited from 45 clinics and practices of a single health system (Intermountain Healthcare, Utah), enrolled at a single-site coordinating center, and randomly assigned to CAD screening with CCTA (n = 452) or to standard national guidelines-based optimal diabetes care (n = 448) (targets: glycated hemoglobin level 50 mg/dL [women] or >40 mg/dL [men], triglycerides level Main outcomes and measures The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization; the secondary outcome was ischemic major adverse cardiovascular events (composite of CAD death, nonfatal MI, or unstable angina). Results At a mean follow-up time of 4.0 (SD, 1.7) years, the primary outcome event rates were not significantly different between the CCTA and t…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2014.15825

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another randomized study showed that routine screening with coronary computed tomography angiography did not reduce the composite rate of all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, or unstable angina in asymptomatic people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.

    “Another randomized study showed that routine screening with coronary computed tomography angiography did not reduce the composite rate of all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, or unstable angina in asymptomatic people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes (211).”
  • Another randomized study showed that routine screening with coronary computed tomography angiography did not reduce the composite rate of all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, or unstable angina in asymptomatic people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.

    “Another randomized study showed that routine screening with coronary computed tomography angiography did not reduce the composite rate of all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, or unstable angina in asymptomatic people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes (200).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 19 · Cited by 373

Authors
Muhlestein, J. B., Lappé, D. L., Lima, J. A. C., Rosen, B. D., May, H. T., Knight, S., Bluemke, D. A., Towner, S. R., Le, V., Bair, T. L., Vavere, A. L., & Anderson, J. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Intermountain Medical Center Heart Institute, Murray, Utah2University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City
  • Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Intermountain Medical Center (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
JAMA
Published
2014-12-03
Volume
312
Issue
21
Pages
2234
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2067143635
Cited by
373
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 6
FWCI
38.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, coronary CT angiography, cardiovascular screening, high cardiovascular risk, all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, LDL cholesterol targets, asymptomatic patients, cardiovascular risk stratification, coronary revascularization
MeSH terms
Aged, Angina, Unstable, Coronary Artery Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Risk, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Coronary Angiography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review