Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 977

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hospital Deaths in Patients With Sepsis From 2 Independent Cohorts

Liu, Vincent, Escobar, Gabriel J., Greene, John D., Soule, Jay, Whippy, Alan, Angus, Derek C., Iwashyna, Theodore J.·2014·JAMA

Abstract

Hospital Deaths in Patients With Sepsis From 2 Independent CohortsSepsis, the inflammatory response to infection, affects millions of patients worldwide. 1However, its effect on overall hospital mortality has not been measured.We quantified the contribution of sepsis to mortality in 2 complementary inpatient cohorts from Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) and the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS).Methods | The KPNC cohort included 482 828 adults (aged ≥18 years) with overnight, nonobstetrical hospitalizations at 21 KPNC hospitals between 2010 and 2012. 2 Compared with all Northern California patients, KPNC patients have broadly similar health characteristics but higher income and educational attainment. 3The NIS, a nationally representative sample of 1051 hospitals, included 6.5 million unweighted adult hospitalizations in 2010. 4e used 2 approaches to identify patients with sepsis from International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes.The explicit approach identified those with codes 038 (septicemia), 995.91 (sepsis), 995.92 (severe sepsis), or 785.52 (septic shock).Because of the known underrecognition of sepsis, we also used an implicit approach adding patients with evidence of both infection and acute organ failure using the Angus implementation 5 of sepsis consensus criteria.Within KPNC data, we delineated diagnoses when coded as present on admission, an important consideration for improving identification and treatment efforts.Furthermore, we linked 97.9% (n = 19 621) of all explicit sepsis cases present on admission in 2012 to KPNC quality improvement data, permitting stratification of patients by com-

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jama.2014.5804

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 977

Metadata

Authors
Liu, V., Escobar, G. J., Greene, J. D., Soule, J., Whippy, A., Angus, D. C., & Iwashyna, T. J.
Venue
JAMA
Published
2014-07-02
Volume
312
Issue
1
Pages
90
ISSN
  • 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
  • 0098-7484
OpenAlex
W2039251546
Cited by
977
References
1
FWCI
36.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hospital Deaths in Patients With Sepsis From 2 Independent Cohorts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.2014.5804
The paper
Liu, V., Escobar, G. J., Greene, J. D., Soule, J., Whippy, A., Angus, D. C., & Iwashyna, T. J. (2014). Hospital Deaths in Patients With Sepsis From 2 Independent Cohorts. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.5804

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.